From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,MAILING_LIST_MULTI autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,45c857e19c4ee2df X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-06-27 14:57:05 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!newsfeed.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news.tele.dk!213.56.195.71!fr.usenet-edu.net!usenet-edu.net!freenix!enst!enst.fr!not-for-mail From: "Beard, Frank" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: RE: Ada95 calendar package question Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2001 17:55:27 -0400 Organization: ENST, France Sender: comp.lang.ada-admin@ada.eu.org Message-ID: Reply-To: comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: marvin.enst.fr Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-Trace: avanie.enst.fr 993679024 49878 137.194.161.2 (27 Jun 2001 21:57:04 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@enst.fr NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2001 21:57:04 +0000 (UTC) To: "'comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org'" Return-Path: X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2448.0) Errors-To: comp.lang.ada-admin@ada.eu.org X-BeenThere: comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.4 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: comp.lang.ada mail<->news gateway List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Errors-To: comp.lang.ada-admin@ada.eu.org X-BeenThere: comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:9169 Date: 2001-06-27T17:55:27-04:00 -----Original Message----- From: Larry Hazel [mailto:lhazel@mindspring.com] > type Months is (Ignore, Jan, Feb, Mar, Apr, May, Jun, Jul, Aug, Sep, Oct, Nov, > Dec); Yes, but then you have put a comment above it explaining what "Ignore" is supposed to mean. I think a better self-documenting place holder would be: type Months is (PlaceHolderSoThatValuesReturnedByAdaCalendarMonthWillLineUpWithThisType, Jan, Feb, Mar, Apr, May, Jun, Jul, Aug, Sep, Oct, Nov, Dec); Frank PS. I case someone can't figure it out, that was really a joke. But the more I think about it, it would probably be alright because no one is going to use the actual value. For initialization, you would be setting the variable to 'FIRST anyway.