From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,MAILING_LIST_MULTI autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,c9ea66d3dcd0bfcf X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-04-27 11:56:22 PST Path: newsfeed.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!skynet.be!freenix!enst!enst.fr!not-for-mail From: "David Botton" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: GNAT license rational (was [ANNOUNCE] XML/Ada 0.5 released) Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2001 14:54:55 -0400 Organization: ENST, France Sender: comp.lang.ada-admin@ada.eu.org Message-ID: References: <5viG6.1064$SZ5.86996@www.newsranger.com> Reply-To: comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: marvin.enst.fr Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: avanie.enst.fr 988397781 6758 137.194.161.2 (27 Apr 2001 18:56:21 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@enst.fr NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2001 18:56:21 +0000 (UTC) To: Return-Path: X-pair-Authenticated: 63.161.15.130 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 Errors-To: comp.lang.ada-admin@ada.eu.org X-BeenThere: comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.3 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: comp.lang.ada mail<->news gateway List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Errors-To: comp.lang.ada-admin@ada.eu.org X-BeenThere: comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org Xref: newsfeed.google.com comp.lang.ada:6996 Date: 2001-04-27T14:54:55-04:00 I don't think any one disputes that they have the absolute right to do as they please. I am _VERY THANKFUL_ of course that the code is released to the public at _all_ even under GPL!! I am just saying that GPL Ada packages are of limitted use to myself and others and is no longer a contribution to Ada advocacy, but to FSF advocacy (something I also agree with, but my priorities are for Ada). Since Ada is such a small player, the advocacy that FSF gets is negligable and certainly not of much value. David Botton ----- Original Message ----- From: "Ted Dennison" > But it really is their call > to make either way.