From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,MAILING_LIST_MULTI autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,fca456da8e6ec463 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-02-08 09:48:10 PST Path: supernews.google.com!sn-xit-02!supernews.com!news.tele.dk!213.56.195.71!fr.usenet-edu.net!usenet-edu.net!enst!enst.fr!not-for-mail From: sk Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Latin, Shakespeare, and other irrelevant topics Date: Thu, 08 Feb 2001 11:46:02 -0600 Organization: ENST, France Sender: comp.lang.ada-admin@ada.eu.org Message-ID: References: Reply-To: comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: marvin.enst.fr Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: avanie.enst.fr 981654488 71868 137.194.161.2 (8 Feb 2001 17:48:07 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@enst.fr NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2001 17:48:07 +0000 (UTC) To: comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org Return-Path: X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.73 [en] (X11; I; Linux 2.2.15-4mdk i686) X-Accept-Language: en Errors-To: comp.lang.ada-admin@ada.eu.org X-BeenThere: comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: comp.lang.ada mail<->news gateway List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Errors-To: comp.lang.ada-admin@ada.eu.org X-BeenThere: comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org Xref: supernews.google.com comp.lang.ada:5007 Date: 2001-02-08T11:46:02-06:00 >It is interesting enough, why exactly "for the most part, these two tasks are >out of range of one individual". Let's imagine an experiment: a person (which >is assumed to be qualified in relevant areas) uses two separate environments >- one for design work and another for implementation. Say, two offices in >different parts of the town. And that person strictly follows the discipline: >no implementaion work in the Design Office, no design work in the Implementation >Office, and there is no way to extract an information from either office (until >the end of the project) except of a single established chanell which connects >those two offices (something like e-mail). > Why that isn't enough? Why that "time-slicing" can't simulate an effect of >two cooperating persons? > (For another division you may imagine an Artistic Office and Pure Enginerring >Office, for example.) So, you mean a clear separation of concerns, a clearly defined protocol to communicate between the offices ... Hey, this thread did get back to Ada after all. o o | \_/ sknipe@ktc.com