From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,MAILING_LIST_MULTI autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,28a755ada641b984 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!news2.google.com!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed.icl.net!newsfeed.fjserv.net!oleane.net!oleane!freenix!enst.fr!melchior!cuivre.fr.eu.org!melchior.frmug.org!not-for-mail From: Stephen Leake Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Longstanding GNAT bug, bad code, or both -- Answer..Bad code. Date: 07 Aug 2004 12:44:13 -0400 Organization: Cuivre, Argent, Or Message-ID: References: <%7XQc.100722$eM2.38916@attbi_s51> NNTP-Posting-Host: lovelace.ada-france.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: melchior.cuivre.fr.eu.org 1091897075 53819 212.85.156.195 (7 Aug 2004 16:44:35 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@melchior.cuivre.fr.eu.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 7 Aug 2004 16:44:35 +0000 (UTC) To: comp.lang.ada@ada-france.org Return-Path: In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p7 (Debian) at ada-france.org X-BeenThere: comp.lang.ada@ada-france.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.4 Precedence: list List-Id: "Gateway to the comp.lang.ada Usenet newsgroup" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:2620 Date: 2004-08-07T12:44:13-04:00 "Jeff C," writes: > Ok. I submitted a bugzilla report and it has already been cancelled. > Apparently, declaring a variable as aliased makes it contrained. (According > to one of the gcc Ada maintainers) Ah. LRM 3.3.1 (9) says this. (I just searched for 'aliased' in the Emacs info version; guess I should have done that earlier :). Presumably I'll get the same response from ACT. Nice to know the Bugzilla list is monitored so closely! > After thinking about it, it is probably why the rule was created > since I suppose otherwise the alias detection/contraint checking > would get pretty hard and potentially computationally expensive at > run time... Sounds reasonable to me. The Annotated reference manual sheds no light on this. -- -- Stephe