From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,
	MAILING_LIST_MULTI autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
	version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,4d5213dac267f6a3
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2004-04-25 16:15:06 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!news2.google.com!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed.icl.net!newsfeed.fjserv.net!nnx.oleane.net!oleane!freenix!enst.fr!melchior!cuivre.fr.eu.org!melchior.frmug.org!not-for-mail
From: "Marius Amado Alves" <amado.alves@netcabo.pt>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Yet another XML and Ada issue
Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2004 01:11:36 -0700
Organization: Cuivre, Argent, Or
Message-ID: <mailman.6.1082934813.313.comp.lang.ada@ada-france.org>
References: 
 <mailman.0.1082904727.313.comp.lang.ada@ada-france.org><c6gp4k$aog$1@a1-hrz.uni-duisburg.de>
	<657ea3e3.0404251320.7a725c41@posting.google.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: lovelace.ada-france.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: melchior.cuivre.fr.eu.org 1082934814 75934 212.85.156.195 (25 Apr
 2004 23:13:34 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@melchior.cuivre.fr.eu.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 25 Apr 2004 23:13:34 +0000 (UTC)
To: <comp.lang.ada@ada-france.org>
Return-Path: <amado.alves@netcabo.pt>
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2615.200
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2615.200
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 25 Apr 2004 23:13:21.0750 (UTC)
	FILETIME=[E6F9EF60:01C42B1A]
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p7 (Debian) at ada-france.org
X-BeenThere: comp.lang.ada@ada-france.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.4
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Gateway to the comp.lang.ada Usenet newsgroup"
	<comp.lang.ada.ada-france.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.ada-france.org/mailman/listinfo/comp.lang.ada>,
	<mailto:comp.lang.ada-request@ada-france.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:comp.lang.ada@ada-france.org>
List-Help: <mailto:comp.lang.ada-request@ada-france.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.ada-france.org/mailman/listinfo/comp.lang.ada>,
	<mailto:comp.lang.ada-request@ada-france.org?subject=subscribe>
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:7489
Date: 2004-04-26T01:11:36-07:00

> What would happen if I suggested to this news group that Ada be
> replaced by "a more compact notation" "useful for writing programs
> when the use of ASIS and other tools are "not required."?

Ocasionally I do generate Ada from specialised notations.

But we're not really disagreeing here. I understand the importance of giving
ecumenical status to some standard, be it XSchema.

What is "FAKE ADA"?