From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM, MAILING_LIST_MULTI autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,8de7eedad50552f1 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!proxad.net!freenix!enst.fr!melchior!cuivre.fr.eu.org!melchior.frmug.org!not-for-mail From: Marius Amado Alves Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Ada bench : count words Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2005 13:28:21 +0000 Organization: Cuivre, Argent, Or Message-ID: References: <87vf7n5njs.fsf@code-hal.de> <423f5813$0$9224$9b4e6d93@newsread4.arcor-online.net> <18arnvu705ly4$.1wz6ybz1jt70y$.dlg@40tude.net> <1q9cx4jt7802s.k45m6mcntl87$.dlg@40tude.net> <460oxs2p0hbc.yjqxjeasx37r.dlg@40tude.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: lovelace.ada-france.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v619.2) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: melchior.cuivre.fr.eu.org 1111498119 66263 212.85.156.195 (22 Mar 2005 13:28:39 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@melchior.cuivre.fr.eu.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2005 13:28:39 +0000 (UTC) To: comp.lang.ada@ada-france.org Return-Path: In-Reply-To: <460oxs2p0hbc.yjqxjeasx37r.dlg@40tude.net> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.619.2) X-OriginalArrivalTime: 22 Mar 2005 13:28:22.0488 (UTC) FILETIME=[04EAD580:01C52EE3] X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at ada-france.org X-BeenThere: comp.lang.ada@ada-france.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Gateway to the comp.lang.ada Usenet newsgroup" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:9730 Date: 2005-03-22T13:28:21+00:00 > Replace End_Of_File with End_Error handling. I tried. No speed gain. >> Get_Line (Buffer, N); > > Get_Line does one extra line scan. So it will be inherently slower. > Then it > would not take any advantage of having Buffer if lines are shorter > than 4K. I know, but how can you do it otherwise with Text_IO? > BTW, you can safely declare Buffer either 1 or 1G bytes... I know, but the benchmark specifies 4096. > ... It should be raw "read". It should, but Text_IO doesn't have it. >> Count_Words (Buffer (1 .. N)); > > Wouldn't it count buffer ends as word separators for lines longer than > 4K? No. Count_Words (S) does not call End_Word at the end of S. The state of In_Word passes unchanged to the next call of Count_Words (if not changed by End_Line). Only a separator or End_Line ends a word.