From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM, MAILING_LIST_MULTI autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,e7151167e0767ecc X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!news2.google.com!proxad.net!freenix!enst.fr!melchior!cuivre.fr.eu.org!melchior.frmug.org!not-for-mail From: Marius Amado Alves Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: State Threads Date: Tue, 07 Sep 2004 01:23:11 +0100 Organization: Cuivre, Argent, Or Message-ID: References: <8429999a.0408231027.2850e800@posting.google.com> <5ad0dd8a.0408302222.56282d6f@posting.google.com> <4135498c_1@news.tm.net.my> <5ad0dd8a.0409040738.3fff41b8@posting.google.com> <5ad0dd8a.0409060515.4b17e2ed@posting.google.com> <5ad0dd8a.0409061024.7c8831fd@posting.google.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lovelace.ada-france.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: melchior.cuivre.fr.eu.org 1094516596 36883 212.85.156.195 (7 Sep 2004 00:23:16 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@melchior.cuivre.fr.eu.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 7 Sep 2004 00:23:16 +0000 (UTC) To: comp.lang.ada@ada-france.org Return-Path: User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 (ax) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en In-Reply-To: <5ad0dd8a.0409061024.7c8831fd@posting.google.com> X-OriginalArrivalTime: 07 Sep 2004 00:22:54.0527 (UTC) FILETIME=[D17FACF0:01C49470] X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at ada-france.org X-BeenThere: comp.lang.ada@ada-france.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.4 Precedence: list List-Id: "Gateway to the comp.lang.ada Usenet newsgroup" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:3401 Date: 2004-09-07T01:23:11+01:00 > ... How exactly would you structure an Ada > application to handle 100K socket connections? With the right compiler and operating system. If any of these does not exist yet, then write it, or, as others indicated, write a supporting library. Whatever you write, do it in Ada :-) >>No. We may be keen on 100% Ada, 0% bugs, but will use a good binding >>happily. GtkAda, Pgsql... > Mercy. Without non-Ada code you could not even boot your computer, so > you are forced to use non-Ada code, it's not your choice. Wasn't that what I said? > Besides, this NIH syndrome is about reusing concepts, not about > reusing code. Sure. Anyway, aren't there operating systems written in Ada, booting many a system? And with well performant, scalable, multitasking?