From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,MAILING_LIST_MULTI autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,d3ac444cc1efa302 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-09-25 13:20:50 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed.stueberl.de!teaser.fr!enst.fr!melchior!cuivre.fr.eu.org!melchior.frmug.org!not-for-mail From: "Beard, Frank Randolph CIV" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: RE: Penalty of calling a protected operation or task-entry. Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2003 16:17:59 -0400 Organization: Cuivre, Argent, Or Message-ID: NNTP-Posting-Host: lovelace.ada-france.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: melchior.cuivre.fr.eu.org 1064521125 11797 80.67.180.195 (25 Sep 2003 20:18:45 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@melchior.cuivre.fr.eu.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2003 20:18:45 +0000 (UTC) To: "Frank" , Return-Path: X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.6375.0 content-class: urn:content-classes:message X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: Penalty of calling a protected operation or task-entry. Thread-Index: AcODlQTzWY2KNA9xT56b5XTAMc0buAADEfkA X-OriginalArrivalTime: 25 Sep 2003 20:18:03.0049 (UTC) FILETIME=[1F5AC990:01C383A2] X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p5 (Debian) at ada-france.org X-BeenThere: comp.lang.ada@ada-france.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.2 Precedence: list List-Id: Gateway to the comp.lang.ada Usenet newsgroup List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:42932 Date: 2003-09-25T16:17:59-04:00 -----Original Message----- From: Frank > Can someone point me to some literature or elaborate on this penalty? Oops! Skipped this question. Section 9.4 of that Ada 95 Rationale goes into the benefits and reasons behind (rationale) asynchronous transfer of control, as implemented=20 with protected types/objects. > Frank Frank