From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM, MAILING_LIST_MULTI autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,8623fab5750cd6aa X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public Path: g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!news.glorb.com!news.cs.univ-paris8.fr!proxad.net!usenet-fr.net!enst.fr!melchior!cuivre.fr.eu.org!melchior.frmug.org!not-for-mail From: Marius Amado Alves Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Improving Ada's image - Was: 7E7 Flight Controls Electronics (why not Universities?) Date: Fri, 04 Jun 2004 19:46:48 +0100 Organization: Cuivre, Argent, Or Message-ID: References: <40b9c99e$0$268$edfadb0f@dread16.news.tele.dk> <40ba315a$0$254$edfadb0f@dread16.news.tele.dk> NNTP-Posting-Host: lovelace.ada-france.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: melchior.cuivre.fr.eu.org 1086374824 45602 212.85.156.195 (4 Jun 2004 18:47:04 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@melchior.cuivre.fr.eu.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 4 Jun 2004 18:47:04 +0000 (UTC) To: comp.lang.ada@ada-france.org Return-Path: User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 (ax) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en In-Reply-To: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 04 Jun 2004 18:46:42.0929 (UTC) FILETIME=[47759610:01C44A64] X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p7 (Debian) at ada-france.org X-BeenThere: comp.lang.ada@ada-france.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.4 Precedence: list List-Id: "Gateway to the comp.lang.ada Usenet newsgroup" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:1105 Date: 2004-06-04T19:46:48+01:00 > In fact this is an area that surprises me most of all! > > Why don't univesities naturally prefer Ada?!?!? I can offer this recent experience. I was hired by a University to teach Imperative and Object-Oriented Languages in 2002/2003. The curriculum included Ada and Smalltalk. I was thrilled. For 2003/2004 another person was put in charge. The new person's background did not include Ada or Smalltalk. So they just changed the curriculum. (To Java and C I think.) Can you see the pattern here? The future teachers are today's students. If they don't have a background in Ada, they won't teach it. This began one generation ago, so Ada is not taught today, and never will be.