From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,MAILING_LIST_MULTI autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,5cb36983754f64da X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2004-04-21 08:11:55 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!news.glorb.com!news.cs.univ-paris8.fr!proxad.net!usenet-fr.net!enst.fr!melchior!cuivre.fr.eu.org!melchior.frmug.org!not-for-mail From: Marius Amado Alves Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: No call for Ada (was Re: Announcing new scripting/prototyping language) Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2004 16:30:23 +0100 Organization: Cuivre, Argent, Or Message-ID: References: Reply-To: amado.alves@netcabo.pt NNTP-Posting-Host: lovelace.ada-france.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: melchior.cuivre.fr.eu.org 1082560235 96233 212.85.156.195 (21 Apr 2004 15:10:35 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@melchior.cuivre.fr.eu.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2004 15:10:35 +0000 (UTC) To: comp.lang.ada@ada-france.org Return-Path: User-Agent: KMail/1.4.3 In-Reply-To: X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p7 (Debian) at ada-france.org X-BeenThere: comp.lang.ada@ada-france.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.4 Precedence: list List-Id: "Gateway to the comp.lang.ada Usenet newsgroup" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:7385 Date: 2004-04-21T16:30:23+01:00 > ... it is not allowed to have a steeringsystem in a > car in Norway that isn't mechanical. I mean servo-steering is allowed..= =2E Curiously enough, servo also introduced problems. I know first hand of an= =20 accident caused by a person used to servobreaks but that was driving an=20 nonservo and failed to push the pedal hard enough. Just a story. > ... Let us hope for your sake that the battery doesn't malfunction... Of course the all 'virtual' control system would include reliability feat= ures.=20 Cannot be just a laptop sending emails to the breaks. There are lots of=20 feasible ways to attain a reliable system. SPARK comes to mind. For the=20 energy an array of redundant small batteries with capacity for say 1 minu= te=20 upon failure of one of them or of the big one(s). The time enough to stop= the=20 car. Everything else would be redundant too. Etc. Mechanical systems fail= =20 too. And these are more hard to make redundant. Well, just my expectation= s of=20 where the car industry should be now, or at least driving at.