From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,MAILING_LIST_MULTI autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,aae01e0853bff01c X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-09-18 01:28:30 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!headwall.stanford.edu!newshub.sdsu.edu!elnk-nf2-pas!newsfeed.earthlink.net!newsfeed.news2me.com!newsfeed.icl.net!newsfeed.fjserv.net!proxad.net!usenet-fr.net!enst.fr!not-for-mail From: Lionel.DRAGHI@fr.thalesgroup.com Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: RE: Should MI be supported (was: Can MI be supported?) Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2003 10:25:17 +0200 Organization: ENST, France Message-ID: NNTP-Posting-Host: marvin.enst.fr Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-Trace: avanie.enst.fr 1063873623 95086 137.194.161.2 (18 Sep 2003 08:27:03 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@enst.fr NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2003 08:27:03 +0000 (UTC) To: comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org Return-Path: X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) X-BeenThere: comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.2 Precedence: list List-Id: comp.lang.ada mail to news gateway List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:42654 Date: 2003-09-18T10:25:17+02:00 | -----Message d'origine----- | De: Matthew Heaney [mailto:matthewjheaney@earthlink.net] .. | Lionel.DRAGHI@fr.thalesgroup.com writes: | | > That's where we differ. I feel much more confortable with Bob's | > translation, because Colorable is not an object, it's a | "properties". | | Perhaps, but I felt (and still do) that my translation was | more faithful | to the C++ example. ... | The mixin approach may translate better to the problem | description, but | it's debatable whether it translates better to the C++ implementation. | As usual, YMMV.... Yes, I agree with you that multiple views idiom match much better Hyman's example than the Mixin's one. But note that i was not discussing this: I was just arguing that Mixin was (in my opinion) a more natural implementation of this particular problem, not a more natural translation of Hyman's code. -- Lionel Draghi