From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,22d1652a85f14a1e X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-02-27 00:48:38 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!logbridge.uoregon.edu!fr.usenet-edu.net!usenet-edu.net!enst.fr!not-for-mail From: Duncan Sands Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Speeding up Ada procedure? Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2003 09:48:20 +0100 Organization: ENST, France Sender: Duncan Sands Message-ID: References: <1d13e1b4.0302261526.40058154@posting.google.com> <17cd177c.0302270038.440cde5@posting.google.com> Reply-To: "comp.lang.ada mail to news gateway" NNTP-Posting-Host: marvin.enst.fr Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: avanie.enst.fr 1046335717 60779 137.194.161.2 (27 Feb 2003 08:48:37 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@enst.fr NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2003 08:48:37 +0000 (UTC) To: "comp.lang.ada mail to news gateway" , gautier_niouzes@hotmail.com (Gautier) Return-Path: User-Agent: KMail/1.5 In-Reply-To: <17cd177c.0302270038.440cde5@posting.google.com> Content-Disposition: inline X-BeenThere: comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1 Precedence: list List-Id: comp.lang.ada mail to news gateway List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:34656 Date: 2003-02-27T09:48:20+01:00 On Thursday 27 February 2003 09:38, Gautier wrote: > Papandopulo: > > I have certain procedures dealing with > > large arrays which are potential performance > > bottlenecks. While they didn't cause > > performance problems yet I intuitively > > feel they will. > > > > Is it a way to remove runtime array > > bounds and other checks for particular > > procedure ? Also, try to avoid cache misses. Duncan.