From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,32bee71a8464bfc2 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!news2.google.com!proxad.net!usenet-fr.net!enst.fr!melchior!cuivre.fr.eu.org!melchior.frmug.org!not-for-mail From: Duncan Sands Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: A bug in gnat/gcc 3.3.3? Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2005 22:47:56 +0100 Organization: Cuivre, Argent, Or Message-ID: References: <1104854323.582074.155390@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com> <2145623.4z7CBdWjFt@linux1.krischik.com> <877jmro9kt.fsf@insalien.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lovelace.ada-france.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: melchior.cuivre.fr.eu.org 1105000776 63617 212.85.156.195 (6 Jan 2005 08:39:36 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@melchior.cuivre.fr.eu.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2005 08:39:36 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Ludovic Brenta To: comp.lang.ada@ada-france.org Return-Path: User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2 In-Reply-To: <877jmro9kt.fsf@insalien.org> Content-Disposition: inline X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at ada-france.org X-BeenThere: comp.lang.ada@ada-france.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Gateway to the comp.lang.ada Usenet newsgroup" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:7511 Date: 2005-01-05T22:47:56+01:00 Hi Ludovic, > I differ with this. The quality of GCC 3.4 is similar to, but not > significantly better than that of GNAT 3.15p. Also, 3.4 is much > slower and memory-hungry than 3.15p (it may or may not matter to you > but it's a fact). More importantly, GCC 3.4 does not have ASIS or > GLADE. Until this changes, I still think that GNAT 3.15p is the best > choice as the foundation of a complete Ada development and runtime > environment. It is important to use only one version of GNAT, because > this makes it possible to distribute programs and shared libraries > that are binary-compatible with each other. The lack of ASIS and > GLADE for GCC 3.4 restricts the set of packages that can be made in > this way. gcc at the pre-ssa CVS tag is pretty good. Ciao, Duncan.