From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,MAILING_LIST_MULTI
	autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,72daad0d97829ad6
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news2.google.com!news3.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!newsfeed00.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!tiscali!newsfeed1.ip.tiscali.net!proxad.net!cleanfeed2-b.proxad.net!nnrp10-1.free.fr!not-for-mail
Return-Path: <Anh.Vo@baesystems.com>
X-Mailer: Novell GroupWise Internet Agent 6.5.6 
Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2006 11:38:23 -0500
From: "Anh Vo" <Anh.Vo@baesystems.com>
To: <comp.lang.ada@ada-france.org>
Subject: Re: Tasking, protected objects, Ada 95 RM
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 18 Jul 2006 16:31:28.0580 (UTC)
	FILETIME=[9EA8B040:01C6AA87]
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ada-france.org
X-BeenThere: comp.lang.ada@ada-france.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.8rc1
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Gateway to the comp.lang.ada Usenet newsgroup"
	<comp.lang.ada.ada-france.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.ada-france.org/mailman/listinfo/comp.lang.ada>,
	<mailto:comp.lang.ada-request@ada-france.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:comp.lang.ada@ada-france.org>
List-Help: <mailto:comp.lang.ada-request@ada-france.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.ada-france.org/mailman/listinfo/comp.lang.ada>,
	<mailto:comp.lang.ada-request@ada-france.org?subject=subscribe>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Message-ID: <mailman.33.1153240751.30988.comp.lang.ada@ada-france.org>
X-Leafnode-NNTP-Posting-Host: 88.191.17.134
Organization: Guest of ProXad - France
NNTP-Posting-Date: 18 Jul 2006 18:44:02 MEST
NNTP-Posting-Host: 88.191.14.223
X-Trace: 1153241042 nnrp10-1.free.fr 23606 88.191.14.223:52169
X-Complaints-To: abuse@proxad.net
Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:5771
Date: 2006-07-18T18:44:02+02:00

> >>> Ed Falis <falis@verizon.net> 7/18/2006 8:30:18 AM >>>
> Ed Falis wrote:

> > An accept statement is not a protected action in the technical
jargon
> > of
> > the RM.  So calling connect from there is not potentially
blocking.

> Sorry, it is "potentially blocking" but not in a manner that is
> meaningful in the context of the quote you gave from the RM - it is
not
> a bounded error in this case.

Tasking is always my favorite interest. In fact, this is a cool,
advanced and complex stuff. Beside Ed's answer, I would suggest that
your codes be posted, if it is not proprietary. This makes the
discussion more precise and no misunderstanding :-)

AV