From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM, MAILING_LIST_MULTI autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,14be6619f79b4573 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!proxad.net!usenet-fr.net!news.enst.fr!melchior!cuivre.fr.eu.org!melchior.frmug.org!not-for-mail From: Duncan Sands Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Hashing on System.Address Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2005 18:22:54 +0200 Organization: Cuivre, Argent, Or Message-ID: References: <1118762290.117858.275280@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lovelace.ada-france.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: melchior.cuivre.fr.eu.org 1118766203 9166 212.85.156.195 (14 Jun 2005 16:23:23 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@melchior.cuivre.fr.eu.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2005 16:23:23 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Matthew Heaney To: comp.lang.ada@ada-france.org Return-Path: User-Agent: KMail/1.8.1 In-Reply-To: <1118762290.117858.275280@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> Content-Disposition: inline X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at ada-france.org X-BeenThere: comp.lang.ada@ada-france.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Gateway to the comp.lang.ada Usenet newsgroup" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:11352 Date: 2005-06-14T18:22:54+02:00 Hi Matthew, > Even if the Integer_Address type is 64 bits, that doesn't necessarily > mean To_Address will return values > 2**32. The easiest thing is to do > is just throw away the upper 32 bits of of the integer value, and then > convert that to type Hash_Type. that's exactly what I did, with some tricks to get around RM4.9.34. > ...You might want to post your question on comp.compilers or one of the OS > newgroups. This is most probably a solved problem. I'm sure it is solved. I had expected solutions to be well known, but apparently they are not. Thanks for your help, Duncan.