From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM, MAILING_LIST_MULTI autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,8522260ffbf09d84 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-11-05 06:08:59 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news2.google.com!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed.icl.net!newsfeed.fjserv.net!newsfeed.freenet.de!newsfeed.r-kom.de!newsfeed.stueberl.de!proxad.net!freenix!enst.fr!melchior!cuivre.fr.eu.org!melchior.frmug.org!not-for-mail From: Marius Amado Alves Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Problem With Self-Referential Access-to-Subprogram Type Date: Wed, 05 Nov 2003 14:02:13 +0000 Organization: Cuivre, Argent, Or Message-ID: References: <80teqv099lspc5d4osf2gmu7cld46i0lvb@4ax.com> <20chqvglnrae8njr0011cfg3a8hc82je7m@4ax.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lovelace.ada-france.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: melchior.cuivre.fr.eu.org 1068040968 10748 80.67.180.195 (5 Nov 2003 14:02:48 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@melchior.cuivre.fr.eu.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2003 14:02:48 +0000 (UTC) To: comp.lang.ada@ada-france.org Return-Path: In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.5 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 05 Nov 2003 14:02:07.0543 (UTC) FILETIME=[66297470:01C3A3A5] X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p5 (Debian) at ada-france.org X-BeenThere: comp.lang.ada@ada-france.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.2 Precedence: list List-Id: Gateway to the comp.lang.ada Usenet newsgroup List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:2084 Date: 2003-11-05T14:02:13+00:00 On Wed, 2003-11-05 at 13:33, Dmitry A.Kazakov wrote: > ... Private types are much more prematurely usable! (:-)) Indeed. And they make *both* definitions possible. (I'm ashamed I did not remembered this before, instead of access types.) But the original question (for incomplete types) remains unanswered.