From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,MAILING_LIST_MULTI autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,7137ee7358078d09 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Return-Path: X-Greylist: delayed 1201 seconds by postgrey-1.24 at green; Fri, 24 Nov 2006 16:35:54 CET In-Reply-To: <1164379701.590201.28750@m7g2000cwm.googlegroups.com> References: <1158593087.194781.250030@e3g2000cwe.googlegroups.com> <450ee6dc$1_4@news.bluewin.ch> <1158609351.098445.226100@d34g2000cwd.googlegroups.com> <1164379701.590201.28750@m7g2000cwm.googlegroups.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Javier Miranda Subject: Re: Basic Explaination of OO in Ada Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2006 10:15:40 -0500 To: "Marco" X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ada-france.org Cc: comp.lang.ada@ada-france.org X-BeenThere: comp.lang.ada@ada-france.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9rc1 Precedence: list List-Id: "Gateway to the comp.lang.ada Usenet newsgroup" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Message-ID: X-Leafnode-NNTP-Posting-Host: 88.191.17.134 Organization: Guest of ProXad - France NNTP-Posting-Date: 24 Nov 2006 16:40:02 MET NNTP-Posting-Host: 88.191.14.223 X-Trace: 1164382802 news-2.free.fr 29832 88.191.14.223:40681 X-Complaints-To: abuse@proxad.net Path: g2news2.google.com!news4.google.com!news3.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!newsfeed00.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!130.59.10.21.MISMATCH!kanaga.switch.ch!switch.ch!news.in2p3.fr!in2p3.fr!feed.ac-versailles.fr!proxad.net!cleanfeed3-a.proxad.net!nnrp15-1.free.fr!not-for-mail Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:7693 Date: 2006-11-24T16:40:02+01:00 On Nov 24, 2006, at 9:48 AM, Marco wrote: > "--- Javier Miranda : > .. but Ada 2005 has the object.method notation (and the recent public > versions of the GNAT compiler already provide such support). This > feature > is described here: > > http://www.ada-auth.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/AIs/AI-00252.TXT?rev=1.16 > " > > Are there any additional over-head / run-time costs associated with > this style syntax? No. There is just a minor additional overhead at compile time because the compiler must support the old and new syntax. > I guess for now only GNAT supports it. I think so ;-) --- Javier Miranda