From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM, MAILING_LIST_MULTI autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,88ed72d98e6b3457 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-11-02 08:19:16 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news2.google.com!news.maxwell.syr.edu!skynet.be!skynet.be!freenix!enst.fr!melchior!cuivre.fr.eu.org!melchior.frmug.org!not-for-mail From: Marius Amado Alves Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Standard Library Interest? (The Big Player IRVINE) Date: Sun, 02 Nov 2003 16:18:36 +0000 Organization: Cuivre, Argent, Or Message-ID: References: <3F7F760E.2020901@comcast.net> <3F8035B0.7080902@noplace.com> <3F816A35.4030108@noplace.com> <3F81FBEC.9010103@noplace.com> <6Ingb.30667$541.13861@nwrdny02.gnilink.net><3F82B4A4.5060301@noplace.com> <3F82F527.3020101@noplace.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lovelace.ada-france.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: melchior.cuivre.fr.eu.org 1067789955 24241 80.67.180.195 (2 Nov 2003 16:19:15 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@melchior.cuivre.fr.eu.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 2 Nov 2003 16:19:15 +0000 (UTC) To: comp.lang.ada@ada-france.org Return-Path: In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.5 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 02 Nov 2003 16:18:24.0550 (UTC) FILETIME=[F0CC7460:01C3A15C] X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p5 (Debian) at ada-france.org X-BeenThere: comp.lang.ada@ada-france.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.2 Precedence: list List-Id: Gateway to the comp.lang.ada Usenet newsgroup List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:1925 Date: 2003-11-02T16:18:36+00:00 On Sun, 2003-11-02 at 15:09, Stephane Richard wrote: > Irvine Ada Compiler's reply to my questionnaire. (a different perspective to > say the least).... > I am also awaiting replies from:.... Stephane more power to you on these enquiries but frankly I fail to see what they contribute to the CAL. They are just opinions. And rather predictable at that: you would not really expect any of them to be against, or "not open", to the idea, would you? You don't ask the principal question, namely about their willingness to invest real resources on the project. Or about who they think would do so.