From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,
	MAILING_LIST_MULTI autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
	version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,60e2922351e0e780
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-11-01 06:34:25 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!news2.google.com!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed.icl.net!newsfeed.fjserv.net!newsfeed.freenet.de!newsfeed.stueberl.de!teaser.fr!enst.fr!melchior!cuivre.fr.eu.org!melchior.frmug.org!not-for-mail
From: Marius Amado Alves <amado.alves@netcabo.pt>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Clause "with and use"
Date: Sat, 01 Nov 2003 14:32:52 +0000
Organization: Cuivre, Argent, Or
Message-ID: <mailman.251.1067697231.25614.comp.lang.ada@ada-france.org>
References: <3FA2CDCB.500F4AF0@fakeaddress.nil>
	<vq5om4lp34c825@corp.supernews.com> <3FA3B796.EA1CAB99@fakeaddress.nil>
NNTP-Posting-Host: lovelace.ada-france.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: melchior.cuivre.fr.eu.org 1067697234 97022 80.67.180.195 (1 Nov 2003
 14:33:54 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@melchior.cuivre.fr.eu.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 1 Nov 2003 14:33:54 +0000 (UTC)
To: comp.lang.ada@ada-france.org
Return-Path: <amado.alves@netcabo.pt>
In-Reply-To: <3FA3B796.EA1CAB99@fakeaddress.nil>
X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.5 
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 01 Nov 2003 14:32:42.0772 (UTC)
	FILETIME=[02642D40:01C3A085]
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p5 (Debian) at ada-france.org
X-BeenThere: comp.lang.ada@ada-france.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.2
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gateway to the comp.lang.ada Usenet newsgroup
	<comp.lang.ada.ada-france.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.ada-france.org/mailman/listinfo/comp.lang.ada>,
	<mailto:comp.lang.ada-request@ada-france.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:comp.lang.ada@ada-france.org>
List-Help: <mailto:comp.lang.ada-request@ada-france.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.ada-france.org/mailman/listinfo/comp.lang.ada>,
	<mailto:comp.lang.ada-request@ada-france.org?subject=subscribe>
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:1902
Date: 2003-11-01T14:32:52+00:00

On Sat, 2003-11-01 at 13:39, Gautier Write-only wrote:
> "with and use A[,B]" is exactly as if "with A[,B]; use A[,B]" was written.
> In your example, "with and use Parent.Child;" will naturally mean
> "with Parent; with Parent.Child; use Parent.Child;".

This is not an example of the proposed rule is it? Where does "with
Parent;" come from?