From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,MAILING_LIST_MULTI autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,4ff929aa5c2b2834 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII Path: g2news2.google.com!news3.google.com!news4.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!newsfeed00.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!feeder.news-service.com!proxad.net!cleanfeed2-b.proxad.net!nnrp6-2.free.fr!not-for-mail Return-Path: Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2006 11:39:55 +0100 From: "Grein, Christoph (Fa. ESG)" Subject: AW: Ranges and (non)static constraints In-reply-to: To: comp.lang.ada@ada-france.org MIME-version: 1.0 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable Content-class: urn:content-classes:message Thread-topic: Ranges and (non)static constraints Thread-index: AccKMOMxs6zKw1+3SwuMpltsdc963gAA1syQ X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 17 Nov 2006 10:39:55.0931 (UTC) FILETIME=[B8DB5EB0:01C70A34] X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ada-france.org X-BeenThere: comp.lang.ada@ada-france.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9rc1 Precedence: list List-Id: "Gateway to the comp.lang.ada Usenet newsgroup" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Message-ID: X-Leafnode-NNTP-Posting-Host: 88.191.17.134 Organization: Guest of ProXad - France NNTP-Posting-Date: 17 Nov 2006 11:45:02 MET NNTP-Posting-Host: 88.191.14.223 X-Trace: 1163760302 news-3.free.fr 8205 88.191.14.223:40654 X-Complaints-To: abuse@proxad.net Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:7521 Date: 2006-11-17T11:45:02+01:00 Dmitry A. Kazakov a =E9crit : > I almost agree with this. However, unfortunately Ada does not require = legality of > type T range 1..N; > for any N, as it IMO should [*] ... > * OK, there still remains a limitation on the biggest universal = integer a compiler > can swallow, but it is a different dimension. I cannot follow. This is legal exactly when the compiler can fulfil the = requested range. So what are you talking about?