From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,MAILING_LIST_MULTI autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,a585ebe495b2eeaf X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-01-24 22:16:37 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!sn-xit-02!sn-xit-06!sn-xit-08!supernews.com!news.tele.dk!news.tele.dk!small.news.tele.dk!fr.usenet-edu.net!usenet-edu.net!enst.fr!not-for-mail From: "Robert C. Leif" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: RE: Idea: create comp.lang.ada.spark - thoughts? Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2003 22:16:07 -0800 Organization: ENST, France Message-ID: Reply-To: "comp.lang.ada mail to news gateway" NNTP-Posting-Host: marvin.enst.fr Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: avanie.enst.fr 1043475396 29798 137.194.161.2 (25 Jan 2003 06:16:36 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@enst.fr NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 25 Jan 2003 06:16:36 +0000 (UTC) To: "'comp.lang.ada mail to news gateway'" Return-Path: X-Envelope-From: rleif@rleif.com X-Envelope-To: X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.4510 Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 X-BeenThere: comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1 Precedence: list List-Id: comp.lang.ada mail to news gateway List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:33420 Date: 2003-01-24T22:16:07-08:00 I believe that SPARK belongs on Comp.Lang.Ada. I hope that Ada 0? will include SPARK or at least the semantics of SPARK as a subset. We could then have Pragma Restrictions(SPARK). Bob Leif -----Original Message----- From: Rod Chapman [mailto:rod.chapman@praxis-cs.co.uk] Sent: Friday, January 24, 2003 3:22 AM To: comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org Subject: Idea: create comp.lang.ada.spark - thoughts? Dear c.l.a We are considering submitting a Request for Disscussion (RFD) to create a new newsgroup: comp.lang.ada.spark This would be an unmoderated group for general discussion of the SPARK Ada subset and its uses. In order for an RFD to be successful there has to be a general critical-mass of interest (and votes!) to make it worth-while... So...what do you think? Good idea? Bad idea? Don't care? Thanks, Rod Chapman, SPARK Team