From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM, MAILING_LIST_MULTI autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,88ed72d98e6b3457 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-10-28 05:30:08 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news2.google.com!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed.vmunix.org!newsfeed.stueberl.de!proxad.net!usenet-fr.net!enst.fr!melchior!cuivre.fr.eu.org!melchior.frmug.org!not-for-mail From: Marius Amado Alves Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Standard Library Interest? Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2003 13:28:44 +0000 Organization: Cuivre, Argent, Or Message-ID: References: <3F7F760E.2020901@comcast.net> <3F8035B0.7080902@noplace.com> <3F816A35.4030108@noplace.com> <3F81FBEC.9010103@noplace.com> <6Ingb.30667$541.13861@nwrdny02.gnilink.net> <3F82B4A4.5060301@noplace.com> <3F82F527.3020101@noplace.com> <3F9E6694.8030705@noplace.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lovelace.ada-france.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: melchior.cuivre.fr.eu.org 1067347794 54098 80.67.180.195 (28 Oct 2003 13:29:54 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@melchior.cuivre.fr.eu.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2003 13:29:54 +0000 (UTC) To: comp.lang.ada@ada-france.org Return-Path: In-Reply-To: <3F9E6694.8030705@noplace.com> X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.5 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 28 Oct 2003 13:28:51.0131 (UTC) FILETIME=[6CE728B0:01C39D57] X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p5 (Debian) at ada-france.org X-BeenThere: comp.lang.ada@ada-france.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.2 Precedence: list List-Id: Gateway to the comp.lang.ada Usenet newsgroup List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:1771 Date: 2003-10-28T13:28:44+00:00 On Tue, 2003-10-28 at 12:52, Marin David Condic wrote: > ... That's why I've been insisting that for a library of any significance to > succeed, its going to need some kind of backing from the Powers That Be. ... This terminology is symptomatic of the lack of *one* Ada Consortium. There is *a lot* of Ada organisations (ARG, AdaIC, Ada-Europe). I can see a productive path in all these and the compiler providers (and through them, user representatives) uniting and forming a global Ada Consortium to deal with things like the CAL. I think Ada is currently too much "ISO-oriented".