From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,MAILING_LIST_MULTI autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,efc4c7de5b60f8a4,start X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news2.google.com!news4.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!nx01.iad01.newshosting.com!newshosting.com!newsfeed.icl.net!newsfeed.fjserv.net!newsfeed.icl.net!proxad.net!cleanfeed2-a.proxad.net!nnrp4-2.free.fr!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: RE: comp.lang.ada Digest, Vol 29, Issue 16 Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2006 10:01:50 -0500 In-Reply-To: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: comp.lang.ada Digest, Vol 29, Issue 16 Thread-Index: Acagl3IDAESqosq+SAC5/0d0cBcKPQAbJR0g From: "Carroll, Andrew" To: X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ada-france.org X-BeenThere: comp.lang.ada@ada-france.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.8rc1 Precedence: list List-Id: "Gateway to the comp.lang.ada Usenet newsgroup" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Message-ID: X-Leafnode-NNTP-Posting-Host: 88.191.17.134 Organization: Guest of ProXad - France NNTP-Posting-Date: 06 Jul 2006 17:04:01 MEST NNTP-Posting-Host: 88.191.14.223 X-Trace: 1152198241 nnrp4-2.free.fr 9937 88.191.14.223:55410 X-Complaints-To: abuse@proxad.net Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:5539 Date: 2006-07-06T17:04:01+02:00 ------------------------------ From: Ludovic Brenta Subject: Re: Licensing, again >The reason why it is a FAQ is because we've been discussing this >licensing issue to death for a couple of weeks now. =20 I don't care WHY the wiki is the FAQ; you missed the point entirely on that one. Ludovic, I thought you were rude when you wrote, "Read that page. I really mean it. Have you read that page? Really?" All I did was ask a question. Like I said before, you could have just answered the question or wrote, "Read the FAQ on wiki". You provided the link, I read it but that does not mean I have to put up with your condescending tone/attitude nor do I have to let you vent your "mailing list stress" on me. Go take it out on your dog! I DO NOT owe you an apology. =20 >Fine: I was nice enough not to blame you for >missing the recent discussion I'm surprised Markus didn't write that line. I don't owe him an apology either. Andrew