From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM, MAILING_LIST_MULTI autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,14be6619f79b4573 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!news3.google.com!news2.google.com!proxad.net!usenet-fr.net!news.enst.fr!melchior!cuivre.fr.eu.org!melchior.frmug.org!not-for-mail From: Duncan Sands Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Hashing on System.Address Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2005 09:27:33 +0200 Organization: Cuivre, Argent, Or Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lovelace.ada-france.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: melchior.cuivre.fr.eu.org 1118734074 21733 212.85.156.195 (14 Jun 2005 07:27:54 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@melchior.cuivre.fr.eu.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2005 07:27:54 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Matthew Heaney To: comp.lang.ada@ada-france.org Return-Path: User-Agent: KMail/1.8.1 In-Reply-To: Content-Disposition: inline X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at ada-france.org X-BeenThere: comp.lang.ada@ada-france.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Gateway to the comp.lang.ada Usenet newsgroup" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:11335 Date: 2005-06-14T09:27:33+02:00 > Good idea. The other thing I haven't really figured out is what to do > if you have a 64-bit address, and Hash_Type is only 32. Ideally you'd > like to compute a 32-bit hash value that uses all 64 bits of the > address. Yes, that's the problem. In fact to be portable the code should work regardless of which type has the bigger modulus. > Alternatively, you could use the ordered container, since type > System.Address has a less than ("<") relational operator. I considered that, but since I'm sure to want to hash on addresses one day, it seemed like a good idea to bite the bullet and come up with a good solution now. By the way, is there any reason why Ada.Containers doesn't provide some standard hash functions? I reckon hashing on strings and on addresses would be pretty handy. Ciao, Duncan.