From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,MAILING_LIST_MULTI autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,a875d9649dde34e3 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!news2.google.com!proxad.net!freenix!enst.fr!melchior!cuivre.fr.eu.org!melchior.frmug.org!not-for-mail From: Stephen Leake Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: GWindows and a future home for it Date: 06 Oct 2004 20:27:41 -0400 Organization: Cuivre, Argent, Or Message-ID: References: <4e8fe302b927b504b93983dba6b0d79f@localhost.talkaboutprogramming.com> <87y8imp52w.fsf@insalien.org> <4163C54F.9050700@netcabo.pt> NNTP-Posting-Host: lovelace.ada-france.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: melchior.cuivre.fr.eu.org 1097108873 72643 212.85.156.195 (7 Oct 2004 00:27:53 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@melchior.cuivre.fr.eu.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 7 Oct 2004 00:27:53 +0000 (UTC) To: comp.lang.ada@ada-france.org Return-Path: In-Reply-To: <4163C54F.9050700@netcabo.pt> User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at ada-france.org X-BeenThere: comp.lang.ada@ada-france.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.4 Precedence: list List-Id: "Gateway to the comp.lang.ada Usenet newsgroup" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:4847 Date: 2004-10-06T20:27:41-04:00 Marius Amado Alves writes: > Ludovic Brenta wrote: > > > Marius Amado Alves writes: > > > >>Two dimensions, different aspects, these words imply that you can > >>have any combination of {open, close} * {free, charged} (one of them > >>being the unfeasible open and charged, unfeasible because the minute > >>you open it, someone will put a copy for free on the Internet, bye > >>bye business). > > Not true; look at Ada Core. Have you ever been able to get your hands > > on GNAT Pro without paying for it? And even if you did, that would > > not stop Ada Core from doing business. > > (Nice trick to keep the thread on topic :-) > > As far as I know GNAT Pro is distributed under a proprietary license. > So, irrelevant. You are incorrect. The GNAT Pro toolset is covered by the same GMGPL license as the public version. There is an informal understanding among supported customers that it is not appropriate to distribute the Pro version to unsupported people, because it is _not_ ready for unsupported use. -- -- Stephe