From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,MAILING_LIST_MULTI autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,15267b2c375b45c2 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-10-26 08:38:53 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news2.google.com!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed.icl.net!newsfeed.fjserv.net!proxad.net!usenet-fr.net!enst.fr!melchior!cuivre.fr.eu.org!melchior.frmug.org!not-for-mail From: sk Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Ada Component Registry proposal Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2003 10:45:37 -0600 Organization: Cuivre, Argent, Or Message-ID: References: <3F92BEAA.9030004@comcast.net> <3F97EBFD.8040901@comcast.net> <3F9879DA.6070205@comcast.net> <3F995D12.5040200@comcast.net> <3F9AB5E9.6060809@comcast.net> <3F9AE6F2.4040108@noplace.com> <3F9AE95F.3090404@comcast.net> <3F9AEB09.9020102@noplace.com> <3F9BCDE0.1070704@noplace.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lovelace.ada-france.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: melchior.cuivre.fr.eu.org 1067186181 80941 80.67.180.195 (26 Oct 2003 16:36:21 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@melchior.cuivre.fr.eu.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2003 16:36:21 +0000 (UTC) To: comp.lang.ada@ada-france.org Return-Path: User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.0.1) Gecko/20020828 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p5 (Debian) at ada-france.org X-BeenThere: comp.lang.ada@ada-france.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.2 Precedence: list List-Id: Gateway to the comp.lang.ada Usenet newsgroup List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:1701 Date: 2003-10-26T10:45:37-06:00 Martin Dowie : > No, check out AI-302 (both proposals :-) After *scanning* these AI's can I ask if there is any thought to keeping additional libraries *out* of the ARM and in a separate hierarchy. I ask, because the thrust of the naming schemes I proposed earlier in the thread were to try to keep away from the "Ada.*", "Interfaces.*" etc unless necessary. The additional libraries are just something that I think is not part of the core language definition. If there are any thoughts in this direction, how seriously are they being considered ? -- ------------------------------------------------- -- Merge vertically for real address -- -- s n p @ t . o -- k i e k c c m -------------------------------------------------