From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,MAILING_LIST_MULTI autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,3d171ebc7489c6b9 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news2.google.com!news3.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!newsfeed00.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!tiscali!newsfeed1.ip.tiscali.net!proxad.net!cleanfeed2-a.proxad.net!nnrp4-2.free.fr!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: Licensing, again Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2006 13:34:47 -0500 In-Reply-To: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: Licensing, again Thread-Index: AcafURscaWyCWIY1SUqvpc4WoSCEhABBnNuQ From: "Carroll, Andrew" To: X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ada-france.org X-BeenThere: comp.lang.ada@ada-france.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.8rc1 Precedence: list List-Id: "Gateway to the comp.lang.ada Usenet newsgroup" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Message-ID: X-Leafnode-NNTP-Posting-Host: 88.191.17.134 Organization: Guest of ProXad - France NNTP-Posting-Date: 05 Jul 2006 20:34:01 MEST NNTP-Posting-Host: 88.191.14.223 X-Trace: 1152124441 nnrp4-2.free.fr 9611 88.191.14.223:39345 X-Complaints-To: abuse@proxad.net Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:5509 Date: 2006-07-05T20:34:01+02:00 ------------------------------ From: M E Leypold Subject: Re: Licensing, again > Well, that is your problem then, man. (Shaking my head). You obviously > don't want an answer. Let me tell you: The Debian policy documents for > choosing the compilers now and in future are exemplary (at least > compared with the usual non documentation of open source stuff goes > :-)).=20 > > And don't expect people to "explain" something to you if you're to > conceited to read some text elsewhere which explains what you want to > know. After all under these circumstance one wouldn't expect you to > read the explanation written in c.l.a, or would you? > > Regards -- Markus ------------------------------ So you're going to try and butt in and make it your problem because you're the ultimate authority on all matters and subjects; especially what Ludovic thinks and what I want. Talk about conceited. =20 After all, YOU would expect me to read the explanation in c.l.a. but I do not revolve around what YOU want. Not to mention that the wiki-link was not presented as a FAQ link before I asked the question nor was it presented as an FAQ in the response to my question. For that matter Ludovic wasn't even the person to say that the wiki IS the FAQ. Andrew