From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, XPRIO_SHORT_SUBJ autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII X-Google-Thread: 103376,ddb34e4ee5e28db0 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2004-04-17 11:29:49 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!news.glorb.com!news.cs.univ-paris8.fr!proxad.net!usenet-fr.net!enst.fr!melchior!cuivre.fr.eu.org!melchior.frmug.org!not-for-mail From: "Andrew Carroll" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: BIND Date: Sat, 17 Apr 2004 12:43:36 -0600 Organization: Cuivre, Argent, Or Message-ID: References: <20040417013014.C95C44C40C2@lovelace.ada-france.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lovelace.ada-france.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: melchior.cuivre.fr.eu.org 1082226345 9471 212.85.156.195 (17 Apr 2004 18:25:45 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@melchior.cuivre.fr.eu.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 17 Apr 2004 18:25:45 +0000 (UTC) To: Return-Path: X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p7 (Debian) at ada-france.org X-BeenThere: comp.lang.ada@ada-france.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.4 Precedence: list List-Id: "Gateway to the comp.lang.ada Usenet newsgroup" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:7271 Date: 2004-04-17T12:43:36-06:00 > ------------------------------ > From: Ludovic Brenta > Subject: Re: BIND > > "Andrew Carroll" writes: > > > ------------------------------ > > > From: "Warren W. Gay VE3WWG" > Subject: Re: No call for Ada > > [snip] > > > That is why I have said in the past that someone needs to rewrite > > > BIND (DNS) in Ada. I would sleep better at night with an Ada version > > > of it exposed to the net than the C versions we use. > > > > I am interested in this. I don't really know if I am qualified, > > but am willing to give it my best. > > The same idea had crossed my mind too, but I'd forgotten. I will > help. I can package it for Debian, do bug tracking, documentation, > code reviews, automated builds, but no design or coding for lack of > time and competence in network programming and security. Andrew, will > you take the lead and start a project on SourceForge? Alright, I can do that. It won't be this weekend though. We should probably check into what Lutz Donnerhacke had to say (below) just to give us an idea of how feasible this would be. I'm not real familiar with SourceForge. Do they provide a discussion board and mailing list? If not, I might be able to get one through the college I graduated from. > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > From: Lutz Donnerhacke > Subject: Re: BIND > > * Ludovic Brenta wrote: > > Who else will help? > > I created a whole framework for UDP and TCP handling. Does this mean you would like to help? > The main problem with DNS is, that the specification does not really exists. > It is mainly specified by the BIND source code. The main part is parsing old > BIND configuration files. Futhermore a non crashing implementation is not > secure. The protocol has several weaknesses itself an can't be implemented > the na�ve way. If what you say is true, then this is something that needs to be looked into. RFC's, books, papers, links? Anyone? Andrew Carroll Carroll-Tech 720-273-6814 andrew@carroll-tech.net