From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM, MAILING_LIST_MULTI autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,7aeecd1069c28415 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!proxad.net!freenix!enst.fr!melchior!cuivre.fr.eu.org!melchior.frmug.org!not-for-mail From: Marius Amado Alves Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Objects and the Stack? Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2004 16:22:44 +0000 Organization: Cuivre, Argent, Or Message-ID: References: <32ej4pF3k243eU1@individual.net> <32o755F3p3ddbU1@individual.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: lovelace.ada-france.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: melchior.cuivre.fr.eu.org 1103559791 28335 212.85.156.195 (20 Dec 2004 16:23:11 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@melchior.cuivre.fr.eu.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2004 16:23:11 +0000 (UTC) To: comp.lang.ada@ada-france.org Return-Path: User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 (ax) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en In-Reply-To: <32o755F3p3ddbU1@individual.net> X-OriginalArrivalTime: 20 Dec 2004 16:22:30.0460 (UTC) FILETIME=[1A63D7C0:01C4E6B0] X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at ada-france.org X-BeenThere: comp.lang.ada@ada-france.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Gateway to the comp.lang.ada Usenet newsgroup" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:7095 Date: 2004-12-20T16:22:44+00:00 > ... apparently my development activities must center on those few areas, > since I'm constantly using access types due to the unknowable-in-advance > quantities and structural relationships of the data that I'm dealing with. You should attend a "No Pointers, Great Programs" tutorial :-) The whole problem with pointers is that languages (incorrectly) mix _allocation_ and _reference_ in them. Every complex design has referential needs (names). A pointerless approach tries to insolate that from the allocation troubles.