From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,MAILING_LIST_MULTI
	autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,967a201c4428b348
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2004-01-01 17:30:31 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!news2.google.com!news.maxwell.syr.edu!skynet.be!freenix!enst.fr!melchior!cuivre.fr.eu.org!melchior.frmug.org!not-for-mail
From: Stephen Leake <stephen_leake@acm.org>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Enumeration representation
Date: 01 Jan 2004 20:29:44 -0500
Organization: Cuivre, Argent, Or
Message-ID: <mailman.198.1073006998.31149.comp.lang.ada@ada-france.org>
References: 
 <pan.2004.01.01.20.44.22.548593@n_o_p_o_r_k_a_n_d_h_a_m.abyss2.demon.co.uk>
	<mailman.197.1072993540.31149.comp.lang.ada@ada-france.org>
	<pan.2004.01.01.22.01.19.175995@n_o_p_o_r_k_a_n_d_h_a_m.abyss2.demon.co.uk>
NNTP-Posting-Host: lovelace.ada-france.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Trace: melchior.cuivre.fr.eu.org 1073006998 42813 80.67.180.195 (2 Jan 2004
 01:29:58 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@melchior.cuivre.fr.eu.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2004 01:29:58 +0000 (UTC)
To: comp.lang.ada@ada-france.org
Return-Path: <stephen_leake@acm.org>
In-Reply-To: 
 <pan.2004.01.01.22.01.19.175995@n_o_p_o_r_k_a_n_d_h_a_m.abyss2.demon.co.uk>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p5 (Debian) at ada-france.org
X-BeenThere: comp.lang.ada@ada-france.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.3
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gateway to the comp.lang.ada Usenet newsgroup
	<comp.lang.ada.ada-france.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.ada-france.org/mailman/listinfo/comp.lang.ada>,
	<mailto:comp.lang.ada-request@ada-france.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:comp.lang.ada@ada-france.org>
List-Help: <mailto:comp.lang.ada-request@ada-france.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.ada-france.org/mailman/listinfo/comp.lang.ada>,
	<mailto:comp.lang.ada-request@ada-france.org?subject=subscribe>
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:4029
Date: 2004-01-01T20:29:44-05:00

"Luke A. Guest" <laguest@n_o_p_o_r_k_a_n_d_h_a_m.abyss2.demon.co.uk> writes:

> On Thu, 01 Jan 2004 16:45:28 -0500, Stephen Leake wrote:
> 
> >> Is this implementation dependent?
> > 
> > In the absence of a representation clause, the representation in RAM
> > is technically implementation dependent, but it's extremely
> > likely to be the same as the position number.
> 
> Hmm, ok. Is there a representation clause that tells the compiler to start
> at a particular value? 

No.

> I looked, but couldn't see it. Having to define every enumeration
> twice could be a pain.

You aren't "defining" them twice. You are defining them once, and
specifying the representation once.

Ada is verbose, in order to be very clear. Get used to it :).

-- 
-- Stephe