From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,MAILING_LIST_MULTI autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,967a201c4428b348 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2004-01-01 13:45:47 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news2.google.com!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed.icl.net!newsfeed.fjserv.net!opentransit.net!wanadoo.fr!freenix!enst.fr!melchior!cuivre.fr.eu.org!melchior.frmug.org!not-for-mail From: Stephen Leake Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Enumeration representation Date: 01 Jan 2004 16:45:28 -0500 Organization: Cuivre, Argent, Or Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lovelace.ada-france.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: melchior.cuivre.fr.eu.org 1072993541 16287 80.67.180.195 (1 Jan 2004 21:45:41 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@melchior.cuivre.fr.eu.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 1 Jan 2004 21:45:41 +0000 (UTC) To: comp.lang.ada@ada-france.org Return-Path: In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p5 (Debian) at ada-france.org X-BeenThere: comp.lang.ada@ada-france.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.3 Precedence: list List-Id: Gateway to the comp.lang.ada Usenet newsgroup List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:4022 Date: 2004-01-01T16:45:28-05:00 "Luke A. Guest" writes: > Hi, > > Am I correct in saying that enumerations don't necessarily begin at zero? Hmm. Say you have: type Enum is (One, Two, Three); Enum'first is One (one definition of "begin" :). Enum'Pos (Enum'first) is 0 (RM 3.5.1 (7) - first position number) However, none of that says what is stored in RAM. If you specify a representation clause: for Enum_Type use (One => 1, Two => 2, Three => 3); Then One will be stored as 1 in RAM. The above values for 'first and 'pos are not changed. > Is this implementation dependent? In the absence of a representation clause, the representation in RAM is technically implementation dependent, but it's extremely likely to be the same as the position number. -- -- Stephe