From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,MAILING_LIST_MULTI autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,2932429f9d2e3e54 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-12-23 09:18:27 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news2.google.com!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed.media.kyoto-u.ac.jp!newsfeed.icl.net!newsfeed.fjserv.net!proxad.net!freenix!enst.fr!melchior!cuivre.fr.eu.org!melchior.frmug.org!not-for-mail From: Stephen Leake Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: ARM equivalents for C++ and Java Date: 23 Dec 2003 12:17:26 -0500 Organization: Cuivre, Argent, Or Message-ID: References: <468D78E4EE5C6A4093A4C00F29DF513D04B82B11@VS2.hdi.tvcabo> NNTP-Posting-Host: lovelace.ada-france.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: melchior.cuivre.fr.eu.org 1072199866 41452 80.67.180.195 (23 Dec 2003 17:17:46 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@melchior.cuivre.fr.eu.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2003 17:17:46 +0000 (UTC) To: comp.lang.ada@ada-france.org Return-Path: In-Reply-To: <468D78E4EE5C6A4093A4C00F29DF513D04B82B11@VS2.hdi.tvcabo> User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p5 (Debian) at ada-france.org X-BeenThere: comp.lang.ada@ada-france.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.3 Precedence: list List-Id: Gateway to the comp.lang.ada Usenet newsgroup List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:3761 Date: 2003-12-23T12:17:26-05:00 "amado.alves" writes: > What would be the ARM equivalents for C++ and Java? I mean a public > marked-up source? Thanks. (This is for an experiment in adaptive > hypertext.) Interesting. I was sure I had at one time read the Java language reference on-line, but now I can't find it. Apparently Sun has decided Java is popular enough that they can charge for the book. One more point for Ada :). I've never seen a C++ reference on line (mostly because I haven't looked), but there probably some of the early drafts from the standardization process available. -- -- Stephe