From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,MAILING_LIST_MULTI autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,15267b2c375b45c2 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-10-22 06:43:41 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news2.google.com!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed.stueberl.de!teaser.fr!enst.fr!melchior!cuivre.fr.eu.org!melchior.frmug.org!not-for-mail From: sk Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Ada Component Registry proposal Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2003 08:51:39 -0500 Organization: Cuivre, Argent, Or Message-ID: References: <3F92BEAA.9030004@comcast.net> <3F95FB78.4090305@comcast.net> <3F9681F8.6090703@noplace.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lovelace.ada-france.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: melchior.cuivre.fr.eu.org 1066830165 75539 80.67.180.195 (22 Oct 2003 13:42:45 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@melchior.cuivre.fr.eu.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2003 13:42:45 +0000 (UTC) To: comp.lang.ada@ada-france.org Return-Path: User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.0.1) Gecko/20020828 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p5 (Debian) at ada-france.org X-BeenThere: comp.lang.ada@ada-france.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.2 Precedence: list List-Id: Gateway to the comp.lang.ada Usenet newsgroup List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:1419 Date: 2003-10-22T08:51:39-05:00 MDC : > Not unless you'd freeze "Adaxx" and add only new stuff to > "Adayy" - and I ... Again I am not going to argue for "Adaxx" and as I have said, I have no vested interest one way or another and the idea was not intended as a version control. From RI Eachus' discussion concerning the standards, and the statement "But the current standard really is Ada 2000,", it would suggest that the current "Ada.*", "Interfaces.*" etc are not frozen either and there is absolutely nothing to prevent vendors from silently implementing an AI update. I am *almost* tempted to do "diffs" on all of the GNAT supplied "Ada.*", "Interfaces.*" for 3,13p and 3.15p, both of which are for Ada'95, to see if there are specification changes to meet AI requirements. ... and again, this issue would occurr no matter what the "root" package was called. -- ------------------------------------------------- -- Merge vertically for real address -- -- s n p @ t . o -- k i e k c c m -------------------------------------------------