From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM, MAILING_LIST_MULTI autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,7b97e385047500eb X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!proxad.net!usenet-fr.net!enst.fr!melchior!cuivre.fr.eu.org!melchior.frmug.org!not-for-mail From: Marius Amado Alves Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Experiences of XML parser generators for Ada? Date: Sat, 04 Dec 2004 11:40:25 +0000 Organization: Cuivre, Argent, Or Message-ID: References: <41af8365@news.wineasy.se> <2426353.SD16GYvm6f@linux1.krischik.com> <41b02dfe$0$25046$ba620e4c@news.skynet.be> <41b0cfc3$1@news.wineasy.se> <41b0f749$0$25068$ba620e4c@news.skynet.be> NNTP-Posting-Host: lovelace.ada-france.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: melchior.cuivre.fr.eu.org 1102160463 6698 212.85.156.195 (4 Dec 2004 11:41:03 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@melchior.cuivre.fr.eu.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 4 Dec 2004 11:41:03 +0000 (UTC) To: comp.lang.ada@ada-france.org Return-Path: User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 (ax) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en In-Reply-To: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 04 Dec 2004 11:40:08.0237 (UTC) FILETIME=[016DC5D0:01C4D9F6] X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at ada-france.org X-BeenThere: comp.lang.ada@ada-france.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Gateway to the comp.lang.ada Usenet newsgroup" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:6752 Date: 2004-12-04T11:40:25+00:00 >>so here comes my advice: think twice before using xml. >>xml is a very powerful tool for DYNAMICALLY STRUCTURED HUMAN READABLE >>TEXT. > > Human readable? I have an impression that punched cards were more readable! > XML reminds me one implementation of Algol 60, in which all keyword were > upper case put in quotes, e.g. 'BEGIN'. Though, even that was more readable > than XML. Indeed XML has failed its two main purposes, which were to be readable by humans and efficiently processable by machines. Maybe there is a third, unwritten, more important need that XML has met, given its apparent widespread adoption. Otherwise XML must be the greatest IT hoax spanning two millenia.