From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM, MAILING_LIST_MULTI autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,5f7d72bde5bb96de X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2004-03-29 08:44:06 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!news.glorb.com!green.octanews.net!news-out.octanews.net!news-out.visi.com!petbe.visi.com!news.octanews.net!proxad.net!usenet-fr.net!enst.fr!melchior!cuivre.fr.eu.org!melchior.frmug.org!not-for-mail From: "Marius Amado Alves" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Is 3.15p -still- the latest GNAT 'p' release? Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2004 17:42:47 +0100 Organization: Cuivre, Argent, Or Message-ID: References: <87wu5834r2.fsf@insalien.org><87isgryxkz.fsf@insalien.org> <1080573502.937367@master.nyc.kbcfp.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lovelace.ada-france.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: melchior.cuivre.fr.eu.org 1080578556 49038 212.85.156.195 (29 Mar 2004 16:42:36 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@melchior.cuivre.fr.eu.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2004 16:42:36 +0000 (UTC) To: Return-Path: X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 29 Mar 2004 16:42:25.0417 (UTC) FILETIME=[D0C24F90:01C415AC] X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p7 (Debian) at ada-france.org X-BeenThere: comp.lang.ada@ada-france.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.4 Precedence: list List-Id: "Gateway to the comp.lang.ada Usenet newsgroup" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:6653 Date: 2004-03-29T17:42:47+01:00 > Excuse me, but this is most assuredly *not* "pirating". All versions > of GNAT, including GNAT pro, are released under the GPL. Indeed it > could hardly be otherwise, since it is a derived work of GCC. It is > completely legal, fair, and honest to distribute GNAT Pro to whomever > you like, and ACT would be in breach of the GPL if they acted to > disallow such a thing (not that they would, of course). You may be right, but strictly not for the reason you give. If ACT owns the copyright to GNAT Pro (which I think they do), they are perfectly entitled to distribute GNAT Pro under a different license than GPL (which I think they don't), including one that makes it piracy to give copies to friends.