From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,MAILING_LIST_MULTI autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,718cf9fb0eb52666 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2004-03-28 04:42:57 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!news.glorb.com!news.cs.univ-paris8.fr!proxad.net!usenet-fr.net!enst.fr!melchior!cuivre.fr.eu.org!melchior.frmug.org!not-for-mail From: "Andrew Carroll" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Win32Ada Linker Problem Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2004 06:00:51 -0700 Organization: Cuivre, Argent, Or Message-ID: References: <20040328100010.A912D4C40A0@lovelace.ada-france.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lovelace.ada-france.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: melchior.cuivre.fr.eu.org 1080477741 29739 212.85.156.195 (28 Mar 2004 12:42:21 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@melchior.cuivre.fr.eu.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2004 12:42:21 +0000 (UTC) To: Return-Path: X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p7 (Debian) at ada-france.org X-BeenThere: comp.lang.ada@ada-france.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.4 Precedence: list List-Id: "Gateway to the comp.lang.ada Usenet newsgroup" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:6630 Date: 2004-03-28T06:00:51-07:00 Okay, I found a path problem. I also uninstalled Borland C++ 5.0. Not that 'that' had anything to do with it. Before I continue banging my head against gnatmake, let me address something you wrote. >> Yes, GNAT 3.15p comes with Win32Ada binding. Hmmm, okay....so I don't need to try and build Win32Ada myself? See, I read somewhere in all the "umpteen" web sites that Win32Ada was needed for something. Either AdaGIDE needed it, or RAPID needed it, or A# needed it. I don't remember, it's been to many hours since I read it. So if Win32Ada is "__built__ into" AdaGIDE then I don't need to build it. Right? I can stop with all the "linker problem" stuff? My next question, based on the RAPID web site. ftp://ftp.usafa.af.mil/pub/dfcs/carlisle/usafa/rapid/index.html NOT http://wuarchive.wustl.edu/languages/ada/usafa/rapid/ Which are different. Carlisle's web site (usafa) says: "(Current implementations utilize the TASH binding to Tcl/Tk, the GNAT to JVM compiler, the Microsoft .NET framework, or GtkAda)." :-), I'm laughing... Does that mean I need TASH, Tcl/Tk "AND" GNAT to JVM "AND" Framework "OR ELSE" Does that mean I need TASH, Tcl/Tk "AND" GNAT to JVM "AND" GtkAda "NOT" the Framework "OR ELSE" Does that mean I need TASH and Tcl/Tk "OR" GNAT to JVM "AND THEN" Framework "OR" GtkAda ???? :-) The wuarchive says it like this: "(Current implementations utilize the TASH binding to Tcl/Tk, the GNAT to JVM compiler, or GNAT for JVM compiler. " With no closing parenthesis. Are you sure we need the GNAT "to" JVM compiler and not the GNAT "for" JVM compiler? What are the chances that the links go to the same "GNAT to/for JVM" compiler page? You gotta be kidding me! Andrew