From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,MAILING_LIST_MULTI autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,cf56949c9ced83a9 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!news2.google.com!proxad.net!usenet-fr.net!enst.fr!melchior!cuivre.fr.eu.org!melchior.frmug.org!not-for-mail From: Stephen Leake Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: implicit cast and inheritance Date: 01 Oct 2004 20:09:34 -0400 Organization: Cuivre, Argent, Or Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lovelace.ada-france.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: melchior.cuivre.fr.eu.org 1096675790 58923 212.85.156.195 (2 Oct 2004 00:09:50 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@melchior.cuivre.fr.eu.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 2 Oct 2004 00:09:50 +0000 (UTC) To: comp.lang.ada@ada-france.org Return-Path: In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at ada-france.org X-BeenThere: comp.lang.ada@ada-france.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.4 Precedence: list List-Id: "Gateway to the comp.lang.ada Usenet newsgroup" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:4539 Date: 2004-10-01T20:09:34-04:00 "Rick Santa-Cruz" writes: > Hi, > > I have a small question. See the following source-code: > package Pack is > type Base is tagged > record > Value: Integer; > end record; > procedure Base_Proc(B: Base); > > type Derived is new Base with > null record; > end Pack; > > And now I have the following source for the main-procedure: > with Pack; > use Pack; > > procedure main is > B: Base; > D: Derived; > procedure Proc(B: Base) is > begin > null; > end Proc; > begin > Pack.Base_Proc(B); -- 1 > Pack.Base_Proc(D); -- 2 > Proc(B); -- 3 > Proc(D); -- 4 > end main; > > It is clear to me, that the (4) won't compile, but I can solve it in making > a cast or defining Proc with 'Class. My question is now why I can call > Base_Proc(D). It is clear to me that the class Derived inherit the > Base_Proc-Procedure from its base-class, but what is with the parameter? Why > does this work? That is _exactly_ what "inherit" means: at the point where Derived is declared, there is implicitly declared: procedure Base_Proc (B : Derived); So you can call it. > I have a suggestion why this works... cause it is in the same > package... but how does it internly work? In this case, there is one compiled version of the body of Base_Proc, and the call Base_Proc (D) calls it. D is passed by reference, so the body doesn't know or care whether it is getting a Base type or a Derived type. > If it is in the same package, is then always implicitly done a cast, > or is the procedure Base_Proc in the derived class "Derived" > automatically defined with a parameter Type "Derived"? There is a difference between declaring a subprogram and providing an implementation for it. Hope this helps, -- -- Stephe