From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,MAILING_LIST_MULTI
	autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,c9bf6617358567a9
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-03-10 12:41:16 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news.tele.dk!news.tele.dk!small.news.tele.dk!proxad.net!freenix!enst.fr!not-for-mail
From: "Robert C. Leif" <rleif@rleif.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: RE: Commercial license?
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2003 12:40:28 -0800
Organization: ENST, France
Message-ID: <mailman.15.1047328874.32742.comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org>
Reply-To: "comp.lang.ada mail to news gateway" <comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org>
NNTP-Posting-Host: marvin.enst.fr
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: avanie.enst.fr 1047328876 58175 137.194.161.2 (10 Mar 2003 20:41:15
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@enst.fr
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2003 20:41:15 +0000 (UTC)
To: "'comp.lang.ada mail to news gateway'" <comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org>
Return-Path: <rleif@rleif.com>
X-Envelope-From: rleif@rleif.com
X-Envelope-To: <comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org>
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.4510
In-Reply-To: <E18sHvC-00014d-00@porton.narod.ru>
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106
Importance: Normal
X-BeenThere: comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: comp.lang.ada mail to news gateway <comp.lang.ada.ada.eu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://ada.eu.org/mailman/listinfo/comp.lang.ada>,
	<mailto:comp.lang.ada-request@ada.eu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:comp.lang.ada-request@ada.eu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://ada.eu.org/mailman/listinfo/comp.lang.ada>,
	<mailto:comp.lang.ada-request@ada.eu.org?subject=subscribe>
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:35153
Date: 2003-03-10T12:40:28-08:00

I believe that the license permits binaries for the end product. Obviously
if you are supplying a library, it must be in source.

Please see http://www.newportinstruments.com/ada_med/ada_med.html
SIGAda 99, Workshop: How do We Expedite the Commercial Use of Ada?
SIGAda '98, Workshop: How do We Expedite the Commercial Use of Ada?
The 2001 Workshop indicates what to make.
SIGAda 2001 Workshop, "Creating a Symbiotic
Relationship Between XML and Ada"
Bob Leif
-----Original Message-----
From: Victor Porton [mailto:porton@ex-code.com] 
Sent: Sunday, March 09, 2003 11:42 PM
To: comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org
Subject: Re: Commercial license?

In article <mailman.0.1047236933.32742.comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org>,
	"Robert C. Leif" <rleif@rleif.com> writes:
> Please go to Newporinstruments.com and switch to Ada_Med or directly to
> http://www.newportinstruments.com/ada_med/ada_med.html and download the
> first item, which is the latest version of the ADA DEVELOPERS =
> COOPERATIVE
> LICENSE.

Are there anywhere in Internet a concise informal reformulating of what 
is said in the license itself? From the first glance it is even not 
simple to understand whether the license permits binary commercial 
(arbitrary licensed) software using a library licensed under ADCL?

Also they say something about that I can request a percentage of money
from profit of selling such a software. Yes? Would this not prevent
customers from buying my software?!