From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,MAILING_LIST_MULTI autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,54889de51045a215 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-10-21 05:23:56 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news2.google.com!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed.stueberl.de!teaser.fr!enst.fr!melchior!cuivre.fr.eu.org!melchior.frmug.org!not-for-mail From: christoph.grein@eurocopter.com Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: += in ada Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2003 14:07:49 +0200 (MET DST) Organization: Cuivre, Argent, Or Message-ID: Reply-To: grein@egypt.otn.eurocopter.de NNTP-Posting-Host: lovelace.ada-france.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: melchior.cuivre.fr.eu.org 1066738943 1912 80.67.180.195 (21 Oct 2003 12:22:23 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@melchior.cuivre.fr.eu.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2003 12:22:23 +0000 (UTC) To: comp.lang.ada@ada-france.org Return-Path: X-Authentication-Warning: mail.eurocopter.com: uucp set sender to using -f Content-MD5: HHyhrKIdSx7HZtEIH7KGxg== X-Mailer: dtmail 1.2.1 CDE Version 1.2.1 SunOS 5.6 sun4u sparc X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p5 (Debian) at ada-france.org X-BeenThere: comp.lang.ada@ada-france.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.2 Precedence: list List-Id: Gateway to the comp.lang.ada Usenet newsgroup List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:1276 Date: 2003-10-21T14:07:49+02:00 From: Preben Randhol > On 2003-10-21, Hyman Rosen wrote: > > Wes Groleau wrote: > >> I don't think Ada's alleged "awkward syntax" > >> is a reason for its unpopularity. > > > > All I know is that when I first became aware of Ada many > > years ago, my reaction was "Oh no! Pascal! Why did it have > > to be Pascal?" (or something to that effect, since I guess > > Ada predates the Indiana Jones movies). I don't think I > > ever recovered from that initial visceral dislike. > > Funny I had the same reaction. However, I recovered fast. I had the exact opposite feeling (back in 1983): Oh, there finally is a language that has everything Pascal is lacking (range limits as attributes etc.).