From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,MAILING_LIST_MULTI
	autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII
X-Google-Thread: 103376,578bd4d051bc4686
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2004-03-25 05:56:11 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!news2.google.com!newsfeed2.dallas1.level3.net!news.level3.com!zeus.visi.com!priapus.visi.com!orange.octanews.net!news-out.visi.com!petbe.visi.com!news.octanews.net!news.tele.dk!news.tele.dk!small.news.tele.dk!proxad.net!usenet-fr.net!enst.fr!melchior!cuivre.fr.eu.org!melchior.frmug.org!not-for-mail
From: Preben Randhol <randhol+abuse@pvv.org>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: OT: GUI [was:]Ann: TeXCAD 4.1
Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2004 14:52:36 +0100
Organization: PVV
Sender: Preben Randhol <randhol@pvv.org>
Message-ID: <mailman.129.1080222793.327.comp.lang.ada@ada-france.org>
References: <c3bv60$kcj$1@a1-hrz.uni-duisburg.de>
	<mailman.106.1079609883.327.comp.lang.ada@ada-france.org>
	<c3ccek$eb6$1@a1-hrz.uni-duisburg.de>
	<slrnc5jfm3.aaf.randhol+valid_for_reply_from_news@k-083152.nt.ntnu.no>
	<c3cl75$9mf$1@a1-hrz.uni-duisburg.de>
	<Btf8c.1014$7f4.318@newsfep4-winn.server.ntli.net>
	<slrnc6325g.77k.randhol+valid_for_reply_from_news@k-083152.nt.ntnu.no>
	<cUj8c.1032$7f4.263@newsfep4-winn.server.ntli.net>
	<slrnc652rp.30r.randhol+valid_for_reply_from_news@k-083152.nt.ntnu.no>
	<KfB8c.1098$7f4.833@newsfep4-winn.server.ntli.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: lovelace.ada-france.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: melchior.cuivre.fr.eu.org 1080222793 67730 212.85.156.195 (25 Mar
 2004 13:53:13 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@melchior.cuivre.fr.eu.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2004 13:53:13 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: comp.lang.ada@ada-france.org
To: chris <spamoff.danx@ntlworld.com>
Return-Path: <randhol@pvv.org>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <KfB8c.1098$7f4.833@newsfep4-winn.server.ntli.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p7 (Debian) at ada-france.org
X-BeenThere: comp.lang.ada@ada-france.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.4
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Gateway to the comp.lang.ada Usenet newsgroup"
	<comp.lang.ada.ada-france.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.ada-france.org/mailman/listinfo/comp.lang.ada>,
	<mailto:comp.lang.ada-request@ada-france.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:comp.lang.ada@ada-france.org>
List-Help: <mailto:comp.lang.ada-request@ada-france.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.ada-france.org/mailman/listinfo/comp.lang.ada>,
	<mailto:comp.lang.ada-request@ada-france.org?subject=subscribe>
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:6505
Date: 2004-03-25T14:52:36+01:00

chris <spamoff.danx@ntlworld.com> wrote on 25/03/2004 (14:50) :
> Preben Randhol wrote:
> >On 2004-03-24, chris <spamoff.danx@ntlworld.com> wrote:
> >
> >>I'm considering that.  How close is it to Windows L&F?
> >
> >It is better.
> 
> Better is good, but is it Windows?  Does it behave like Windows people 
> will expect?

What does windows people expect except that the application should crash?

> A(n?) usability experiment.  I want to see if people find Pie Menus more 
> productive in practice.

Thought you wanted Window L&F

-- 
Preben Randhol -------------- http://www.pvv.org/~randhol/Ada95 --
                 �For me, Ada95 puts back the joy in programming.�