From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,
	MAILING_LIST_MULTI autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
	version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,714a8558b02b32bb
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2004-01-21 07:44:24 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!news2.google.com!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed.stueberl.de!teaser.fr!usenet-fr.net!enst.fr!melchior!cuivre.fr.eu.org!melchior.frmug.org!not-for-mail
From: "amado.alves" <amado.alves@netcabo.pt>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: RE: GUI was Re: why Ada is so unpopular ?
Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2004 15:42:36 -0000
Organization: Cuivre, Argent, Or
Message-ID: <mailman.12.1074699773.281.comp.lang.ada@ada-france.org>
NNTP-Posting-Host: lovelace.ada-france.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Trace: melchior.cuivre.fr.eu.org 1074699773 47371 80.67.180.195 (21 Jan 2004
 15:42:53 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@melchior.cuivre.fr.eu.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2004 15:42:53 +0000 (UTC)
To: <comp.lang.ada@ada-france.org>
Return-Path: <amado.alves@netcabo.pt>
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.6487.1
content-class: urn:content-classes:message
X-MS-Has-Attach: 
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: 
Thread-Topic: GUI was Re: why Ada is so unpopular ?
Thread-Index: AcPgI39i8Q79/vZlSKehHHOtAxn+swAEBCgv
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 21 Jan 2004 15:42:37.0677 (UTC)
	FILETIME=[3235A1D0:01C3E035]
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p5 (Debian) at ada-france.org
X-BeenThere: comp.lang.ada@ada-france.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.3
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gateway to the comp.lang.ada Usenet newsgroup
	<comp.lang.ada.ada-france.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.ada-france.org/mailman/listinfo/comp.lang.ada>,
	<mailto:comp.lang.ada-request@ada-france.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:comp.lang.ada@ada-france.org>
List-Help: <mailto:comp.lang.ada-request@ada-france.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.ada-france.org/mailman/listinfo/comp.lang.ada>,
	<mailto:comp.lang.ada-request@ada-france.org?subject=subscribe>
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:4606
Date: 2004-01-21T15:42:36+00:00

<<...If GtkAda was going to return a=20
list of something, shouldn't it ought to be a *Charles* list rather than =

something that was specific to GtkAda? ...>>

Absolutely. This is a fascinating issue. I thought about it when I wrote =
here before, but kept silent. But now that you've touched it, I'll add a =
bit. A *lot* of Ada libraries, including already standard ones (e.g. =
ASIS) and upcoming standard (e.g. Directory_Operations), deal with a lot =
of data structures, and so they should be using the standard for that =
(Ada.Containers, also upcoming, AI-302). The result would be clearly a =
good thing, more cohesion both in the standard and in applications. This =
is motivation number 1 for Ada.Containers in my paper in Ada-Europe 2004 =
(about persistent containers, but touching the general issue in =
passing).