From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,MAILING_LIST_MULTI autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,b9c1962801ad6b73 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-01-22 00:12:41 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!logbridge.uoregon.edu!fr.usenet-edu.net!usenet-edu.net!enst.fr!not-for-mail From: "Grein, Christoph" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Fussy Standard: what is modulo Address? Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2003 09:05:36 +0100 (MET) Organization: ENST, France Message-ID: Reply-To: "Grein, Christoph" , "comp.lang.ada mail to news gateway" NNTP-Posting-Host: marvin.enst.fr Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: avanie.enst.fr 1043223161 6554 137.194.161.2 (22 Jan 2003 08:12:41 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@enst.fr NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2003 08:12:41 +0000 (UTC) To: comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org Return-Path: X-Authentication-Warning: mail.eurocopter.com: uucp set sender to using -f Content-MD5: xb3K+qfRkCIUD/12ybK4fg== X-Mailer: dtmail 1.2.1 CDE Version 1.2.1 SunOS 5.6 sun4u sparc X-BeenThere: comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1 Precedence: list List-Id: comp.lang.ada mail to news gateway List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:33337 Date: 2003-01-22T09:05:36+01:00 > 13.3.22-23. "For a prefix X that denotes a subtype or object: > X'Alignment... Address modulo the Alignment". > > The Standard seems to not explain what is "Address modulo". > > It can be: > > 1. The integer mathematical operation fpr > System.Storage_Element.Integer_Address. > > 2. Operation "mod" for System.Address, defined also in System. > > Moreover the Standard probably does not say anything about relations of > these two operations (they should be the same as people seem to tend to > naturally consider these the same). > > We should correct it, yes? You seem to have point here. Report it to ada-comment@ada-auth.org.