From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,MAILING_LIST_MULTI autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,fa17c2bd3c0ec0f7 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news2.google.com!news1.google.com!news.germany.com!feed.xsnews.nl!feeder.xsnews.nl!proxad.net!cleanfeed1-b.proxad.net!nnrp8-2.free.fr!not-for-mail Return-Path: Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) In-Reply-To: <44cb39a1$0$32184$636a55ce@news.free.fr> References: <44cb39a1$0$32184$636a55ce@news.free.fr> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Marius Amado-Alves Subject: Re: Qt4Ada: Qt for Ada Date: Sat, 29 Jul 2006 15:24:35 +0100 To: comp.lang.ada@ada-france.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2) X-Antivirus-Scanner: Clean mail though you should still use an Antivirus X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - zaphen.serversonline.net X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ada-france.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [0 0] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - amado-alves.info X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ada-france.org X-BeenThere: comp.lang.ada@ada-france.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.8rc1 Precedence: list List-Id: "Gateway to the comp.lang.ada Usenet newsgroup" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Message-ID: X-Leafnode-NNTP-Posting-Host: 88.191.17.134 Organization: Guest of ProXad - France NNTP-Posting-Date: 29 Jul 2006 16:25:47 MEST NNTP-Posting-Host: 88.191.14.223 X-Trace: 1154183147 nnrp8-2.free.fr 11798 88.191.14.223:45385 X-Complaints-To: abuse@proxad.net Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:6014 Date: 2006-07-29T16:25:47+02:00 > On the "administrative" side, I have some wonder about licensing. > Has it's > only a personal project, I think GPLv2 would be fine. What's your > opinion? > I also have plans to release it on SourceForge, necessary step if > more than > one person will work on it. Again, any suggestion is appreciated. Then let me suggest a progressive license (softdevelcoop.org), the only scheme that makes sense if one wants to balance the right of the developers and the rights of the users. The SDC site is at the disposal of all progressive software stakeholders.