From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,MAILING_LIST_MULTI
	autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,19e4a2b12c5b43fa
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-01-22 00:08:41 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!syros.belnet.be!news.belnet.be!deine.net!freenix!enst.fr!not-for-mail
From: "Grein, Christoph" <christoph.grein@eurocopter.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Intermixing two storage pools
Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2003 09:01:03 +0100 (MET)
Organization: ENST, France
Message-ID: <mailman.11.1043222919.4961.comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org>
Reply-To: "Grein, Christoph" <christoph.grein@eurocopter.com>, "comp.lang.ada
	mail to news gateway" <comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org>
NNTP-Posting-Host: marvin.enst.fr
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Trace: avanie.enst.fr 1043222920 6539 137.194.161.2 (22 Jan 2003 08:08:40
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@enst.fr
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2003 08:08:40 +0000 (UTC)
To: comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org
Return-Path: <christoph.grein@eurocopter.com>
X-Authentication-Warning: mail.eurocopter.com: uucp set sender to
	<christoph.grein@eurocopter.com> using -f
Content-MD5: pB14l8sfC1ZxW5M4RkvuKA==
X-Mailer: dtmail 1.2.1 CDE Version 1.2.1 SunOS 5.6 sun4u sparc 
X-BeenThere: comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: comp.lang.ada mail to news gateway <comp.lang.ada.ada.eu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://ada.eu.org/mailman/listinfo/comp.lang.ada>,
	<mailto:comp.lang.ada-request@ada.eu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:comp.lang.ada-request@ada.eu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://ada.eu.org/mailman/listinfo/comp.lang.ada>,
	<mailto:comp.lang.ada-request@ada.eu.org?subject=subscribe>
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:33336
Date: 2003-01-22T09:01:03+01:00

> I have to user-defined storage pools.
> 
> Is it OK to allocate ("new") by one of them and deallocate by the other 
> ("Uncheked_Deallocation"), using conversions between access types.

No, as far as I know that's even erroneous. You must deallocated from the same 
pool you allocated it.

If you think about it, it's quite obvious that you should take account of the 
allocated item's 
origin.