From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,31178c24bcde806e X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-01-13 03:56:03 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!logbridge.uoregon.edu!fr.usenet-edu.net!usenet-edu.net!enst.fr!not-for-mail From: "Grein, Christoph" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Finalization of tagged types - problem Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2003 12:48:45 +0100 (MET) Organization: ENST, France Sender: comp.lang.ada-admin@ada.eu.org Message-ID: Reply-To: comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: marvin.enst.fr Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: avanie.enst.fr 1042458962 38702 137.194.161.2 (13 Jan 2003 11:56:02 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@enst.fr NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2003 11:56:02 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: X-Authentication-Warning: mail.eurocopter.com: uucp set sender to using -f Content-MD5: bEqfwujrPavSJfOGqQYCgA== X-Mailer: dtmail 1.2.1 CDE Version 1.2.1 SunOS 5.6 sun4u sparc Errors-To: comp.lang.ada-admin@ada.eu.org X-BeenThere: comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.13 Precedence: bulk X-Reply-To: "Grein, Christoph" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Id: comp.lang.ada mail<->news gateway List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: comp.lang.ada-admin@ada.eu.org X-BeenThere: comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:32959 Date: 2003-01-13T12:48:45+01:00 > > I've published a few years ago in Ada Letters a paper "Add Finalization" dealing > > with this problem. You can find it online on my home page > > > > > > Christoph, thanks. You're welcome. > So is it your opinion: derive from Controlled if it may be needed > in a derived? No, it's not my opinion, it's a fact that you cannot add controlledness to unlimited types later without getting into an ocean of troubled water. But I would not derive from Controlled just for suspense it might be needed later. When it turns out to be necessary, this is a design change, so you have to go back in any case and rethink the design. > BTW, Is derivance from Controlled a big overhead? Finalization causes the overhead because a queue of objects to be finalized has to be maintained for each scope. Initialization and adjustment are cheap. Also here, there's no free lunch.