From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,
	REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,2ae1a0032f54059
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-01-09 06:02:11 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!bloom-beacon.mit.edu!news-out.cwix.com!newsfeed.cwix.com!news.tele.dk!news.tele.dk!small.news.tele.dk!fr.usenet-edu.net!usenet-edu.net!enst.fr!not-for-mail
From: "David C. Hoos" <david.c.hoos.sr@ada95.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Ada vs Interfaces.C types
Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2003 08:01:14 -0600
Organization: ENST, France
Sender: comp.lang.ada-admin@ada.eu.org
Message-ID: <mailman.1042120922.26638.comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org>
References: <20030109014828.1ba9cb7a.david@realityrift.com>
 <dstanbro-61749A.23200409012003@mec2.bigpond.net.au>
Reply-To: comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: marvin.enst.fr
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-15"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: avanie.enst.fr 1042120922 8766 137.194.161.2 (9 Jan 2003 14:02:02
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@enst.fr
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2003 14:02:02 +0000 (UTC)
Return-Path: <david.c.hoos.sr@ada95.com>
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106
Errors-To: comp.lang.ada-admin@ada.eu.org
X-BeenThere: comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.13
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <http://ada.eu.org/mailman/listinfo/comp.lang.ada>,
	<mailto:comp.lang.ada-request@ada.eu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: comp.lang.ada mail<->news gateway <comp.lang.ada.ada.eu.org>
List-Post: <mailto:comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:comp.lang.ada-request@ada.eu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://ada.eu.org/mailman/listinfo/comp.lang.ada>,
	<mailto:comp.lang.ada-request@ada.eu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: comp.lang.ada-admin@ada.eu.org
X-BeenThere: comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:32821
Date: 2003-01-09T08:01:14-06:00


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Dale Stanbrough" <dstanbro@bigpond.net.au>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
To: <comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org>
Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 6:21 AM
Subject: Re: Ada vs Interfaces.C types


> In article <20030109014828.1ba9cb7a.david@realityrift.com>,
>  David Holm <david@realityrift.com> wrote:
> 
> > Hi,
> > are the following safe to assume?
> > 
> > Interfaces.C.unsigned = Integer
> > Interfaces.C.short = Short_Integer
> > Interfaces.C.C_Float = Float
> > Interfaces.C.double = Long_Float
> 
> 
> I think that gnat is based on this assumption, but of course
> that is only one compiler.

How can an unsigned type of any sort be considered equivalent
to Integer (a signed type) by any compiler?

> 
> Dale
> _______________________________________________
> comp.lang.ada mailing list
> comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org
> http://ada.eu.org/mailman/listinfo/comp.lang.ada
>