From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,
	REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,d14ef72cb8e7209e,start
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-01-07 09:10:07 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!logbridge.uoregon.edu!fr.usenet-edu.net!usenet-edu.net!teaser.fr!enst.fr!not-for-mail
From: "Alexandre E. Kopilovitch" <aek@vib.usr.pu.ru>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: incomplete languages (was: Re: Anybody in US using ADA ? One
    silly idea..)
Date: Tue,  7 Jan 2003 19:01:18 +0300 (MSK)
Organization: h w c employees, b f
Sender: comp.lang.ada-admin@ada.eu.org
Message-ID: <mailman.1041959403.11003.comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org>
Reply-To: comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: marvin.enst.fr
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Trace: avanie.enst.fr 1041959404 14154 137.194.161.2 (7 Jan 2003 17:10:04
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@enst.fr
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 7 Jan 2003 17:10:04 +0000 (UTC)
Return-Path: <aek@vib.usr.pu.ru>
X-Mailer: Mail/@ [v2.44 MSDOS]
Errors-To: comp.lang.ada-admin@ada.eu.org
X-BeenThere: comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.13
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <http://ada.eu.org/mailman/listinfo/comp.lang.ada>,
	<mailto:comp.lang.ada-request@ada.eu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: comp.lang.ada mail<->news gateway <comp.lang.ada.ada.eu.org>
List-Post: <mailto:comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:comp.lang.ada-request@ada.eu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://ada.eu.org/mailman/listinfo/comp.lang.ada>,
	<mailto:comp.lang.ada-request@ada.eu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: comp.lang.ada-admin@ada.eu.org
X-BeenThere: comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:32684
Date: 2003-01-07T19:01:18+03:00

"Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de> wrote:
>A need in a meta language indicates that the core language is incomplete.
>Then the question is only whether this incompleteness is inherent or not.
>As long as the former is not proved I will claim that we do not need a meta
>language.

But it is well-known fact (from the first half of 20 century, thanks Godel),
that every language that is rich enough is necessarily incomplete.


Alexander Kopilovitch                      aek@vib.usr.pu.ru
Saint-Petersburg
Russia