From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,MAILING_LIST_MULTI autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,54889de51045a215 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-10-16 20:00:47 PST From: sk Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: += in ada Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2003 22:01:41 -0500 Organization: Cuivre, Argent, Or Message-ID: References: <3F7316F7.219F@mail.ru> <49cbf610.0310101231.2358762a@posting.google.com> <49cbf610.0310150616.3503a1c4@posting.google.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lovelace.ada-france.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: melchior.cuivre.fr.eu.org 1066359214 95327 80.67.180.195 (17 Oct 2003 02:53:34 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@melchior.cuivre.fr.eu.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2003 02:53:34 +0000 (UTC) To: comp.lang.ada@ada-france.org Return-Path: User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.0.1) Gecko/20020828 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p5 (Debian) at ada-france.org X-BeenThere: comp.lang.ada@ada-france.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.2 Precedence: list List-Id: Gateway to the comp.lang.ada Usenet newsgroup List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Path: archiver1.google.com!news2.google.com!fu-berlin.de!feed.ac-versailles.fr!freenix!enst.fr!melchior!cuivre.fr.eu.org!melchior.frmug.org!not-for-mail Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:1045 Date: 2003-10-16T22:01:41-05:00 18k11tm001@sneakemail.com: > ... 98% of programmers; ... Where did you come by that statistic ? I think this is the third year in a row that you have proposed the "augmented" operators isn't it ? Would it be safe to say that 98% of Ada programmers are not interested ? And if this is so, can you not accept that the CLA netizens are not particularly interested in your proposed augmented operators ? > ... Nor did I ever call *everyone* who doesn't want ":+" fools. Your tone does suggest that you think that all who do not agree are fools :-) -- ------------------------------------------------- -- Merge vertically for real address -- -- s n p @ t . o -- k i e k c c m -------------------------------------------------