From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,9e2f60618cf3eaa8 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-10-25 04:09:21 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed.icl.net!newsfeed.fjserv.net!proxad.net!freenix!enst.fr!not-for-mail From: "David C. Hoos, Sr." Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Distributed Ada (Annex E) Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2002 06:07:44 -0500 Organization: ENST, France Sender: comp.lang.ada-admin@ada.eu.org Message-ID: References: <3DB479E6.1725E12C@lmco.nospammmmmm.com> <87lm4qsybu.fsf@inf.enst.fr> <7vlm4qoars.fsf@vlinux.voxelvision.no> <807366e2.0210221346.1d6b0df0@posting.google.com> <7vadl5o5m2.fsf@vlinux.voxelvision.no> <807366e2.0210232145.7e5d0d45@posting.google.com> <807366e2.0210240727.7ed8ba8c@posting.google.com> <807366e2.0210242102.6204eceb@posting.google.com> Reply-To: comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: marvin.enst.fr Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: avanie.enst.fr 1035544143 6948 137.194.161.2 (25 Oct 2002 11:09:03 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@enst.fr NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2002 11:09:03 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Errors-To: comp.lang.ada-admin@ada.eu.org X-BeenThere: comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.13 Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: , List-Id: comp.lang.ada mail<->news gateway List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: comp.lang.ada-admin@ada.eu.org X-BeenThere: comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:30126 Date: 2002-10-25T06:07:44-05:00 This has proven enlightening -- GNU sed 3.02 behaves differently on Linux than on XP -- with the same shell. On XP I'm using cygwin. I'll have to get and try mingw, and try the latest GNU sed (if it's not 3.02), and send a bug report to the appropriate folks. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Wilhelm Spickermann" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada To: Sent: October 25, 2002 12:02 AM Subject: Re: Distributed Ada (Annex E) > "David C. Hoos" wrote in message news:... > ... > > > > FWIW on my system (XP Professional) GNU sed version 3.02 > > > > works just fine, but clearly the 013 is wrong, unless you're > > > > trying to delete Vertical Tabs (not very likely). > > > > > > Well, my 3.02 works fine too :-) . But AFAIK the backslash is used in sed > > to > > > escape single characters and not for octal notation. So I think > > > sed 's/\015//g' is the same as > > > sed 's/015//g' and it does not remove any carriage returns but only > > strings > > > "015". > > > > > At the shell prompt I issued sed s/015//g not sed 's/015//g' -- perhaps > > that is the > > difference > > > Hmm, I don't see any backslashes in your text... But even if I use > sed s/\015//g it only results in deleting the string "015" while > leaving the carriage returns untouched (bash and csh under Linux). > > But the original problem was about the result of the lines in > Garlic/Makefile.in and Dist/config.sdefault. They contained the > apostrophes. I still presume they never removed any control characters. > > Wilhelm > _______________________________________________ > comp.lang.ada mailing list > comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org > http://ada.eu.org/mailman/listinfo/comp.lang.ada > >