From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.1 required=5.0 tests=AXB_XMAILER_MIMEOLE_OL_024C2, BAYES_00,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,8a602a7f65bebaea X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-10-18 14:24:03 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed.icl.net!newsfeed.fjserv.net!proxad.net!freenix!enst.fr!not-for-mail From: "David C. Hoos" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Abstract methods in ADA95 Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2002 16:23:27 -0500 Organization: ENST, France Sender: comp.lang.ada-admin@ada.eu.org Message-ID: References: <20021017-143635-828420@foorum.com> <3DAF0ECE.7080204@acm.org> <3DB0785A.1040304@acm.org> Reply-To: comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: marvin.enst.fr Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: avanie.enst.fr 1034976242 26222 137.194.161.2 (18 Oct 2002 21:24:02 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@enst.fr NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2002 21:24:02 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 Errors-To: comp.lang.ada-admin@ada.eu.org X-BeenThere: comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.13 Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: , List-Id: comp.lang.ada mail<->news gateway List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: comp.lang.ada-admin@ada.eu.org X-BeenThere: comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:29924 Date: 2002-10-18T16:23:27-05:00 ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jeffrey Carter" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada To: Sent: Friday, October 18, 2002 4:08 PM Subject: Re: Abstract methods in ADA95 > SteveD wrote: > > Don't confuse abstract terminology with programming language nomenclature. > > Both Ada and C++ have "methods". > > There are no "methods", either in abstract terminology or actual > programming languages. AFAIKS, "method" is a new name for an old concept > made up to muddy the waters by people who were trying to present old > concepts as something new that they'd invented. The Smalltalk language defined "methods" from the beginning. So, unless you don't consider Smalltalk an "actual programming language," your preceding statement is incorrect.